XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion, us.issues.abortion   
   From: sd@sd.net   
      
   rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in   
   news:7943568.0402141807.349eb33d@posting.google.com:   
      
   > William Klee  wrote in message   
   > news:<130220042244051879%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...   
   >> In article <7943568.0402131635.22b1aac3@posting.google.com>, Robert B.   
   >> Winn  wrote:   
   >>   
   >> > William Klee  wrote in message   
   >> > news:<130220041337354693%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...   
   >> > > In article <7943568.0402130652.74172485@posting.google.com>,   
   >> > > Robert B. Winn  wrote:   
   >> > >   
   >> > > > William Klee  wrote in message   
   >> > > > news:<130220040415200767%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...   
   >> > > > > In article <7943568.0402121817.6bf7c77d@posting.google.com>,   
   >> > > > > Robert B. Winn  wrote:   
   >> > > > >   
   >> > > > > > William Klee  wrote in message   
   >> > > > > > news:<120220041242179994%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...   
   >> > > > > > > In article   
   >> > > > > > > <7943568.0402111424.8d8aa8d@posting.google.com>, Robert   
   >> > > > > > > B.   
   >> > > > > > > Winn  wrote:   
   >> > > > > > >   
   >> > > > > > > > William Klee  wrote in message   
   >> > > > > > > > news:<100220041730409085%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...   
   >> > > > > > > > > In article   
   >> > > > > > > > > ,   
   >> > > > > > > > > Mark K. Bilbo  wrote:   
   >> > > > > > > > >   
   >> > > > > > > > > > And so upon Tue, 10 Feb 2004 14:27:31 -0800 didst   
   >> > > > > > > > > > Robert B. Winn speak thusly:   
   >> > > > > > > > > >   
   >> > > > > > > > > > > "Mark K. Bilbo"  wrote in   
   >> > > > > > > > > > > message   
   >> > > > > > > > > > > news:> > > > > > > > > > > i>...   
   >> > > > > > > > > > >> And so upon Sun, 08 Feb 2004 12:27:10 -0800 didst   
   >> > > > > > > > > > >> Robert B. Winn speak thusly:   
   >> > > > > > > > > > >>   
   >> > > > > > > > > > >> > Al Klein  wrote in message   
   >> > > > > > > > > > >> > news:> > > > > > > > > > >> > >...   
   >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> On 7 Feb 2004 15:27:08 -0800,   
   >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> rbwinn47@mybluelight.com   
   >> > >  (Robert   
   >> > >  B.   
   >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> Winn) posted in alt.atheism:   
   >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>   
   >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> >> And have you gone there and walked through   
   >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> >> the tunnel?   
   >>   
   >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> >I don't need to go there and walk through the   
   >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> >tunnel to know it exists.  I have read the   
   >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> >book of Isaiah.   
   >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>   
   >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> Then you "know" that 600,000 men, their wives   
   >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> and children "escaped" from Egypt and spent 40   
   >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> years living in the desert, even though it   
   >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> never happened.  Making you a liar, at best.   
   >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>   
   >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> >> >The same could be said of New York City   
   >>   
   >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> >> Nope - no one is claiming that there's a   
   >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> >> tunnel running from 57th Street to 125th   
   >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> >> Street under   
   >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> >> Central Park.  But it someone did I'd tell   
   >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> >> him he's just as insane as you are.   
   >>   
   >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> >I was talking about the entire city.  How can   
   >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> >you   
   >>  prove it   
   >>  exists   
   >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> >to   
   >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> >someone who has never been there?   
   >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>   
   >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> Why would I want to?  Cities exist.  Ordinary   
   >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> claims don't require extraordinary proof.   
   >> > > > > > > > > > >> >   
   >> > > > > > > > > > >> > Exactly my sentiments.  Here is an ordinary   
   >> > > > > > > > > > >> > scripture from the Bible.   
   >> > > > > > > > > > >> > Luke 2:5  To be taxed with Mary his espoused   
   >> > > > > > > > > > >> > wife, being great with child.   
   >> > > > > > > > > > >>   
   >> > > > > > > > > > >> Which scripture in the original does not include   
   >> > > > > > > > > > >> the word "child."   
   >> > > > > > > > > > >>   
   >> > > > > > > > > > >> What was wrong with Luke anyway? Why'd he leave   
   >> > > > > > > > > > >> the word out? Was he stupid?   
   >> > > > > > > > > > >   
   >> > > > > > > > > > > No. Just read chapter one of Luke and you will   
   >> > > > > > > > > > > find out he was not stupid.   
   >> > > > > > > > > >   
   >> > > > > > > > > > So why didn't he use the word "child" in that verse   
   >> > > > > > > > > > you love to quote?   
   >> > > > > > > > >   
   >> > > > > > > > > Hope you're wearing your earplugs, because the silence   
   >> > > > > > > > > will be deafening.   
   >> > > > > > > >   
   >> > > > > > > > Well, as a matter of fact, he did.   
   >> > > > > > >   
   >> > > > > > > Purely in the sense of he didn't.   
   >> > > > > > >   
   >> > > > > > > > Being a prophet of God, it was   
   >> > > > > > > > revealed to him that his words would be translated into   
   >> > > > > > > > English in 1611 as, great with child, so he was even   
   >> > > > > > > > more motivated to write what he wrote.   
   >> > > > > > >   
   >> > > > > > > You have a cite or quote to prove that? No? Didn't think   
   >> > > > > > > you did.   
   >> > > > > >   
   >> > > > > > Yes, we have Luke 1:41 in which Luke makes the same   
   >> > > > > > description of John the Baptist while he was in his mother's   
   >> > > > > > womb.  So are you going to claim that you cannot discern   
   >> > > > > > that Jesus Christ was a child while he was in his mother's   
   >> > > > > > womb?   
   >> > > > >   
   >> > > > > I don't see why a fictional woman couldn't have a fictional   
   >> > > > > child, but until it's born, it's a fictional fetus.   
   >> > > > >   
   >> > > > > > What a surprise.  Why don't you go pretend that you are   
   >> > > > > > feeble minded to someone else.   
   >> > > > >   
   >> > > > > I don't need to. You're doing a bang-up job all by yourself.   
   >> > > > > *If* you're pretending, which is doubtful.   
   >> > > >   
   >> > > > Well, as I predicted, you continue to claim that you do not know   
   >> > > > what a child is.  Let's see how blue in the face you can get.   
   >> > >   
   >> > > Let's see where I claimed I didn't know what a child is. Oops, I   
   >> > > *didn't* claim that. If there is a jesus, he's not happy about all   
   >> > > your lying, boobie.   
   >> >   
   >> > Right here.  Remember this scripture?  Luke 2:5  To be taxed with   
   >> > Mary his espoused wife, being great with child.   
   >>   
   >> Non-sequitor, boobie. If you can't back up your wild claims, be a man   
   >> and admit it. Or be a christian and lie about it; your choice.   
   >   
   > Well, was Jesus Christ a child when he was in his mother's womb?  The   
   > scripture says he was.   
   > Robert b. winn   
      
   Did that scripture come from the same silly book that claims the sun   
   revolves around the earth?  Ths same idiotic book that that claims the   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)