XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism
XPost: alt.religion.christian, alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion
XPost: talk.atheism, us.issues.abortion
From: fnord2k@yahoo.com
In article <7943568.0402140720.440bbe2d@posting.google.com>, Robert B.
Winn wrote:
> William Klee wrote in message
> news:<130220042310357280%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...
> > In article <7943568.0402131603.90fab99@posting.google.com>, Robert B.
> > Winn wrote:
> >
> > > William Klee wrote in message
> > > news:<130220041340003375%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...
> > > > In article <7943568.0402130636.7aaeee2e@posting.google.com>, Robert B.
> > > > Winn wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > William Klee wrote in message
> > > > > news:<130220040424112629%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...
> > > > > > In article <7943568.0402121818.5674221@posting.google.com>, Robert
> > > > > > B.
> > > > > > Winn wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > William Klee wrote in message
> > > > > > > news:<120220041250309537%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...
> > > > > > > > In article <7943568.0402120635.3cd7c5af@posting.google.com>,
> Robert
> > > > > > > > B.
> > > > > > > > Winn wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > "ZenIsWhen" wrote in message
> > > > > > > > > news:<102m2j9ednr7p9a@corp.supernews.com>...
> > > > > > > > > > "Robert B. Winn" wrote in
message
> > > > > > > > > > news:7943568.0402111713.3265a65@posting.google.com...
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Personally I think that the pro-abortion faction that
> > promotes and
> > > > > > > > > > > encourages certain actions should be held legally
> responsible
> > for
> > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > consequences of the actions.
> > > > > > > > > > > Robert B. Winn
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Logically, I conclude that a person who starts an argument
> with
> > the
> > > > > > > > > > lie
> > > > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > there is such a thing as "pro-abortionist", already has
> their
> > head
> > > > > > > > > > up
> > > > > > > > > > their
> > > > > > > > > > ignorant ass!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Profanity is the attempt of a weak mind to make a strong
> > > > > > > > > statement.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Objection to profanity is the realization of a weak mind that
> they
> > > > > > > > can't address the point presented and must attempt distraction.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Well, I don't really think so.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What you think is meaningless drivel, as so eloquently presented in
> > > > > > each and every one of your posts. My point stands unchallenged.
> > > > >
> > > > > Well, I already recognized the declaration of war made by
pro-abortion
> > > > > people against the United States. The challenge was by you.
> > > >
> > > > You claim I challenged my own point? Your idiocy is priceless, boobie.
> >
> > A:
> > > Well, if you declared war against the United States,
> >
> > Which I haven't.
> >
> > B:
> > > and you are a
> > > United States citizen,
> >
> > Which I am.
> >
> > C:
> > > that would mean that you are engaged in treason
> > > against the United States.
> >
> > Simple AND-gate logic. For C to be true, both A and B must be true.
> > Since A is false, C is false.
>
> A is true.
Is it?
> If you have killed 50,000,000 American children, you have
> declared war on the United States, whether or not you said you did.
Since I have killed *no* children, much less 50,000,000 of them, A is
false. Why do you keep lying?
> Actions speak louder than words.
Says the guy who sits on his ass.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
