Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.flame.abortion    |    Abortion sucks... literally    |    4,310 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,362 of 4,310    |
|    Christopher A. Lee to Winn    |
|    Re: immoral people    |
|    15 Feb 04 13:25:20    |
      XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism       XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion, us.issues.abortion       From: calee@optonline.net              On 15 Feb 2004 05:17:48 -0800, rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B.       Winn) wrote:                     >> And when has the US defined the fetus as a child?       >       >Children inside their mother's wombs were defined as children long       >before the United States even existed. For instance, in the King       >James version of the Bible, we find the following scripture, Luke 2:5       > To be taxed with Mary his espoused wife, being great with child.       > As can be seen from this scripture, Jesus Christ was a child while       >he was inside his mother's womb, a fact recognized by the translators       >as recently as 1611. Whether all people after that time pretended to       >be feeble minded the way you are pretending, I would have to take some       >time to study.              Here's a hint, moron: the bible is not part of the law of the United       States.              Answer his question: WHEN HAS THE US DEFINED THE FETUS AS A CHILD?              >Robert B. Winn              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca