XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism
XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion, us.issues.abortion
From: sd@sd.net
rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in
news:7943568.0402150512.2f4e6c46@posting.google.com:
> sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in message
> news:...
>> rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in message
>> news:<7943568.0402141759.2a227f2c@posting.google.com>...
>> > Bob wrote in message
>> > news:...
>> > > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in
>> > > news:7943568.0402140419.6da833f2@posting.google.com:
>> > >
>> > > > Bob wrote in message
>> > > > news:...
>> > > >> rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in
>> > > >> news:7943568.0402121738.39e86e38@posting.google.com:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> > Bob wrote in message
>> > > >> > news:...
>> > > >> >> William Klee wrote in
>> > > >> >> news:120220041240031923%fnord2k@yahoo.com:
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >> > In article
>> > > >> >> > <7943568.0402111221.6c8e95b0@posting.google.com>,
>> > > >> >> > Robert B. Winn wrote:
>> > > >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> "Mark K. Bilbo" wrote in message
>> > > >> >> >> news:...
>> > > >> >> >> > And so upon Sun, 08 Feb 2004 20:18:18 -0800 didst
>> > > >> >> >> > Robert B. Winn speak thusly:
>> > > >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> > > "Mark K. Bilbo" wrote in message
>> > > >> >> >> > > news:..
>> > > >> >> >> > > .
>> > > >> >> >> > >> And so upon Sat, 07 Feb 2004 06:23:27 -0800 didst
>> > > >> >> >> > >> Robert B. Winn speak thusly:
>> > > >> >> >> > >>
>> > > >> >> >> > >> > The only way for it to be legal would be for the
>> > > >> >> >> > >> > judicial system to be involved.
>> > > >> >> >> > >> > They were involved only by sentencing millions of
>> > > >> >> >> > >> > Americans to death without a trial.
>> > > >> >> >> > >>
>> > > >> >> >> > >> It could only be legal if they were involved but
>> > > >> >> >> > >> it's not legal because they were involved?
>> > > >> >> >> > >>
>> > > >> >> >> > >> Is the room spinning Boobert?
>> > > >> >> >> > >
>> > > >> >> >> > > You cannot legally sentence Americans to death
>> > > >> >> >> > > because they belong to some arbitrary classification.
>> > > >> >> >> > > They all individually have the right to trial by
>> > > >> >> >> > > jury.
>> > > >> >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >> > And how many courts are paying attention to your
>> > > >> >> >> > interpretation of the law?
>> > > >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> As I understand it, all courts in the United States at
>> > > >> >> >> the present time are pro-abortion, and no person who is
>> > > >> >> >> not pro-abortion can be a judge.
>> > > >> >> >
>> > > >> >> > Your first four words explain why the rest of your post is
>> > > >> >> > incorrect.
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >> Actually, the poster forgot to insert the word "don't" in
>> > > >> >> those first four words. :o))
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > Well, since the pro-abortion faction has seen fit to kill
>> > > >> > 50,000,000 American children, it behooves me as a United
>> > > >> > States citizen to officially recognize their declaration of
>> > > >> > war against the United States.
>> > > >> > Robert B. winn
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> But since you effectivly admitted in other ng posts that you
>> > > >> cannot name even one of these 50,000,000 "children" that were
>> > > >> killed, we can safely assume that you are just lying again,
>> > > >> looney toon. You don't have any credibility here at all.
>> > > >
>> > > > I can name all of them if it is necessary for me to do it.
>> > > > Robert B. Winn
>> > > >
>> > > Sure you can, looney toon, sure you can. Just like you can
>> > > produce evidence of your mythical isaiah, jesus and god bs. Like
>> > > never?
>> >
>> > Well, my suggestion would be that we wait until Christ returns, and
>> > then you can tell him your proof that he does not exist.
>> > Robert B. winn
>>
>> Again you run away when you cannot support your delusions. Why should
>> we wait for an non-existant entity and an event that will never
>> happen. You you state that Christ existed, then it is up to you to
>> prove it objectively. If you state that he will return, then you must
>> prove it objectively. If you state that you can name all the born
>> children (the only type of children that actually exist) that have
>> been killed by abortions, and they number 50 million, then it is up to
>> you to prove it.
>>
>> So far, whenever anyone has cornered you, you try to hide behind your
>> mythology, as is that will protect you. All you do is run away. You
>> have NOTHING to base your arguments on except your opinions, and
>> nobody will accept your opinions as fact.
>>
>> Your religion means NOTHING to anyone that doesn't follow it. You,
>> for some reason, cannot accept this. I will make this simple. For
>> most of us in these abortion newsgroups that you confront, your
>> religious beliefs mean nothing. We want you to back up your
>> assertions with cold, hard, objective facts. Your religon is none of
>> these things. And your constant use of religion to try to weasel out
>> of providing objective evidence and arguments in support of your
>> assertions and opinions contribute greatly to the general perception
>> that you are a lunatic, and an idiot.
>>
>> Mark Sebree
>
> The cold hard facts are 50,000,000 dead children. This is your
> problem, not mine. It is something you will have to resolve. I have
> never been involved in abortion.
> Robert b. Winn
>
Yet you cannot name even one of those "50,000,000 dead children, looney
toon. And by posting to these abortion-choice newsgroups you are
involving yourself with abortion.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
