XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion, us.issues.abortion   
   From: fnord2k@yahoo.com   
      
   In article <7943568.0402150519.2b305ad2@posting.google.com>, Robert B.   
   Winn  wrote:   
      
   > William Klee  wrote in message   
   > news:<140220042347496414%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...   
   > > In article <7943568.0402141753.678325ea@posting.google.com>, Robert B.   
   > > Winn  wrote:   
   > >   
   > > > William Klee  wrote in message   
   > > > news:<130220042248227308%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...   
   > > > > In article <7943568.0402131746.acceb8a@posting.google.com>, Robert B.   
   > > > > Winn  wrote:   
   > > > >   
   > > > > > William Klee  wrote in message   
   > > > > > news:<130220041333169145%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...   
   > > > > > > In article <7943568.0402130701.544a8693@posting.google.com>, Robert   
   > > > > > > B.   
   > > > > > > Winn  wrote:   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > William Klee  wrote in message   
   > > > > > > > news:<130220040407453513%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...   
   > > > > > > > > In article <7943568.0402121755.3b77f430@posting.google.com>,   
   > Robert   
   > > > > > > > > B.   
   > > > > > > > > Winn  wrote:   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > William Klee  wrote in message   
   > > > > > > > > > news:<100220040005207972%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...   
   > > > > > > > > > > In article <7943568.0402090759.2fa08420@post   
   ng.google.com>,   
   > >  Robert   
   > > > > > > > > > > B.   
   > > > > > > > > > > Winn  wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > Thomas P.  wrote in   
   > message   
   > > > > > > > > > > > news:...   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 07 Feb 2004 19:25:54 -0600, "Mark K. Bilbo"   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >  wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >And so upon Sat, 07 Feb 2004 15:00:14 -0800 didst   
   > Robert B.   
   > >  Winn   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >speak   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >thusly:   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > >  snip   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > Well, I would be more inclined to believe Isaiah   
   > than   
   > >  a   
   > > > >  bunch   
   > > > >  of   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > atheist archeologists.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Meaning you'll ignore what people who actually went   
   > and   
   > >  *looked   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> have to   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> say.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >>   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Well, Christian tourists to Jerusalem claim to be   
   > going   
   > >  through a   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >> tunnel between Gihon spring and the pool of Siloam.   
   > You   
   > >  atheists   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >> have   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >> them walking through solid rock because the   
   > construction   
   > >  of   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Hezekiah's   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >> tunnel is described in the Bible and so the tunnel   
   > has   
   > >  to be   
   > > > >  a   
   > > > >  myth.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >And, yet, that wasn't what was being talked about was   
   > it?   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > Nor has anyone suggested that anything mentioned in the   
   > >  Bible   
   > >  must   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > be   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > a myth anymore than anything mentioned in a novel must   
   > be   
   > >  untrue.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > His   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > stupidity is becoming more depressing and tedious.   
   > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > Well, maybe you would like to stop responding to my   
   posts.   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > When you're more irritating than entertaining, you're gone.   
   > >  Until   
   > > > > > > > > > > then,   
   > > > > > > > > > > you're a chewtoy.   
   > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > Well, we could try a scripture from Isaiah.  Some   
   pro-abortion   
   > > > > > > > > > people   
   > > > > > > > > > do not find Isaiah entertaining.  14:16  They that see thee   
   > shall   
   > > > > > > > > > narrowly look upon thee, and consider thee, saying, Is this   
   > the   
   > > > > > > > > > man   
   > > > > > > > > > that made the earth to tremble, that did shake kingdoms:   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > Another non-sequitor, chewtoy. Is that all you've got?   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > No, Isaiah wrote some other scriptures.  14 20  Thou shalt not be   
   > > > > > > > joined with them in burial, because thou hast destroyed thy land,   
   > > > > > > > and   
   > > > > > > > slain thy people: the seed of evildoers shall never be renowned.   
   > > > > > > > I think this is especially true of pro-abortion people.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > And yet another non-sequitor. Guess you *don't* have anything else.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > Well, as a matter of fact I do.  14:21  Prepare slaughter for his   
   > > > > > children for the iniquity of their fathers;  that they do not rise,   
   > > > > > nor posess the land, nor fill the face of the world with cities.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Still yet again another non-sequitor, boobie. You still have nothing.   
   > > >   
   > > > 14:22  For I will rise up against them, saith the Lord of hosts,and   
   > > > cut off from Babylon the name, and remnant, and son and nephew, saith   
   > > > the Lord.   
   > >   
   > > And still yet again *another* non-sequitor. You have nothing.   
   >   
   > I have the fact that I have not been involved in killing any children.   
      
   Still a non-sequitor. I have not been involved in setting fires in   
   orphanages, but, like your claim above, this has nothing to do with the   
   topic at hand.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)