XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion, us.issues.abortion   
   From: sd@sd.net   
      
   rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in   
   news:7943568.0402171925.33a432d7@posting.google.com:   
      
   > Bob  wrote in message news:...   
   >> rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in   
   >> news:7943568.0402151748.374e3b71@posting.google.com:   
   >>   
   >> > Bob  wrote in message   
   >> > news:...   
   >> >> rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in   
   >> >> news:7943568.0402150512.2f4e6c46@posting.google.com:   
   >> >>   
   >> >> > sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in message   
   >> >> > news:...   
   >> >> >> rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in message   
   >> >> >> news:<7943568.0402141759.2a227f2c@posting.google.com>...   
   >> >> >> > Bob  wrote in message   
   >> >> >> > news:...   
   >> >> >> > > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in   
   >> >> >> > > news:7943568.0402140419.6da833f2@posting.google.com:   
   >> >> >> > >   
   >> >> >> > > > Bob  wrote in message   
   >> >> >> > > > news:...   
   >> >> >> > > >> rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in   
   >> >> >> > > >> news:7943568.0402121738.39e86e38@posting.google.com:   
   >> >> >> > > >>   
   >> >> >> > > >> > Bob  wrote in message   
   >> >> >> > > >> > news:...   
   >> >> >> > > >> >> William Klee  wrote in   
   >> >> >> > > >> >> news:120220041240031923%fnord2k@yahoo.com:   
   >> >> >> > > >> >>   
   >> >> >> > > >> >> > In article   
   >> >> >> > > >> >> > <7943568.0402111221.6c8e95b0@posting.google.com>,   
   >> >> >> > > >> >> > Robert B. Winn  wrote:   
   >> >> >> > > >> >> >   
   >> >> >> > > >> >> >> "Mark K. Bilbo"  wrote in   
   >> >> >> > > >> >> >> message   
   >> >> >> > > >> >> >> news:> >> >> > > >> >> >> >.. .   
   >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > And so upon Sun, 08 Feb 2004 20:18:18 -0800 didst   
   >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Robert B. Winn speak thusly:   
   >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >   
   >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > "Mark K. Bilbo"  wrote in   
   >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > message   
   >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >  news:> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >  kchi   
   >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >.. .   
   >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> And so upon Sat, 07 Feb 2004 06:23:27 -0800   
   >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> didst Robert B. Winn speak thusly:   
   >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >>   
   >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> > The only way for it to be legal would be for   
   >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> > the judicial system to be involved.   
   >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> > They were involved only by sentencing   
   >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> > millions of Americans to death without a   
   >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> > trial.   
   >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >>   
   >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> It could only be legal if they were involved   
   >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> but it's not legal because they were involved?   
   >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >>   
   >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> Is the room spinning Boobert?   
   >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >   
   >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > You cannot legally sentence Americans to death   
   >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > because they belong to some arbitrary   
   >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > classification.   
   >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >  They all individually have the right to trial   
   >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >  by jury.   
   >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >   
   >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > And how many courts are paying attention to your   
   >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > interpretation of the law?   
   >> >> >> > > >> >> >>   
   >> >> >> > > >> >> >> As I understand it, all courts in the United States   
   >> >> >> > > >> >> >> at the present time are pro-abortion, and no person   
   >> >> >> > > >> >> >> who is not pro-abortion can be a judge.   
   >> >> >> > > >> >> >   
   >> >> >> > > >> >> > Your first four words explain why the rest of your   
   >> >> >> > > >> >> > post is incorrect.   
   >> >> >> > > >> >>   
   >> >> >> > > >> >> Actually, the poster forgot to insert the word "don't"   
   >> >> >> > > >> >> in those first four words.  :o))   
   >> >> >> > > >> >   
   >> >> >> > > >> > Well, since the pro-abortion faction has seen fit to   
   >> >> >> > > >> > kill 50,000,000 American children, it behooves me as a   
   >> >> >> > > >> > United States citizen to officially recognize their   
   >> >> >> > > >> > declaration of war against the United States.   
   >> >> >> > > >> > Robert B. winn   
   >> >> >> > > >> >   
   >> >> >> > > >> But since you effectivly admitted in other ng posts that   
   >> >> >> > > >> you cannot name even one of these 50,000,000 "children"   
   >> >> >> > > >> that were killed, we can safely assume that you are just   
   >> >> >> > > >> lying again, looney toon.  You don't have any credibility   
   >> >> >> > > >> here at all.   
   >> >> >> > > >   
   >> >> >> > > > I can name all of them if it is necessary for me to do it.   
   >> >> >> > > > Robert B. Winn   
   >> >> >> > > >   
   >> >> >> > > Sure you can, looney toon, sure you can.  Just like you can   
   >> >> >> > > produce  evidence of your mythical isaiah, jesus and god bs.   
   >> >> >> > > Like never?   
   >> >> >> >   
   >> >> >> > Well, my suggestion would be that we wait until Christ   
   >> >> >> > returns, and then you can tell him your proof that he does not   
   >> >> >> > exist. Robert B. winn   
   >> >> >>   
   >> >> >> Again you run away when you cannot support your delusions.  Why   
   >> >> >> should we wait for an non-existant entity and an event that will   
   >> >> >> never happen.  You you state that Christ existed, then it is up   
   >> >> >> to you to prove it objectively.  If you state that he will   
   >> >> >> return, then you must prove it objectively.  If you state that   
   >> >> >> you can name all the born children (the only type of children   
   >> >> >> that actually exist) that have been killed by abortions, and   
   >> >> >> they number 50 million, then it is up to you to prove it.   
   >> >> >>   
   >> >> >> So far, whenever anyone has cornered you, you try to hide behind   
   >> >> >> your mythology, as is that will protect you.  All you do is run   
   >> >> >> away.  You have NOTHING to base your arguments on except your   
   >> >> >> opinions, and nobody will accept your opinions as fact.   
   >> >> >>   
   >> >> >> Your religion means NOTHING to anyone that doesn't follow it.   
   >> >> >> You, for some reason, cannot accept this.  I will make this   
   >> >> >> simple.  For most of us in these abortion newsgroups that you   
   >> >> >> confront, your religious beliefs mean nothing.  We want you to   
   >> >> >> back up your assertions with cold, hard, objective facts.  Your   
   >> >> >> religon is none of these things.  And your constant use of   
   >> >> >> religion to try to weasel out of providing objective evidence   
   >> >> >> and arguments in support of your assertions and opinions   
   >> >> >> contribute greatly to the general perception that you are a   
   >> >> >> lunatic, and an idiot.   
   >> >> >>   
   >> >> >> Mark Sebree   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> > The cold hard facts are 50,000,000 dead children.  This is your   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)