XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion, us.issues.abortion   
   From: fnord2k@yahoo.com   
      
   In article <7943568.0402171836.3a1f5151@posting.google.com>, Robert B.   
   Winn  wrote:   
      
   > William Klee  wrote in message   
   > news:<150220041542548294%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...   
   > > In article <7943568.0402151231.45ef45d3@posting.google.com>, Robert B.   
   > > Winn  wrote:   
   > >   
   > > > William Klee  wrote in message   
   > > > news:<150220040006253399%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...   
   > > > > In article <7943568.0402140721.2633d746@posting.google.com>, Robert B.   
   > > > > Winn  wrote:   
   > > > >   
   > > > > > William Klee  wrote in message   
   > > > > > news:<130220042308118651%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...   
   > > > > > > In article <7943568.0402131600.6ba30a1d@posting.google.com>, Robert   
   > > > > > > B.   
   > > > > > > Winn  wrote:   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > William Klee  wrote in message   
   > > > > > > > news:<130220041341469728%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...   
   > > > > > > > > In article <7943568.0402130639.34c16580@posting.google.com>,   
   > Robert   
   > > > > > > > > B.   
   > > > > > > > > Winn  wrote:   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > William Klee  wrote in message   
   > > > > > > > > > news:<120220041249064493%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...   
   > > > > > > > > > > In article <7943568.0402110720.195ef130@post   
   ng.google.com>,   
   > >  Robert   
   > > > > > > > > > > B.   
   > > > > > > > > > > Winn  wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > William Klee  wrote in message   
   > > > > > > > > > > > news:<110220040009355235%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > In article   
   > , Al   
   > >  Klein   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >  wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 19:22:53 -0600, William Klee   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > posted in alt.atheism:   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >In article   
   > >  <7943568.0402092019.744b77ee@posting.google.com>,   
   > >  Robert   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >B.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Winn  wrote:   
   > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> The Constitution gives individual United States   
   > >  citizens   
   > > > >  the   
   > > > >  right   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> to   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> inform traitors that their declaration of war   
   > against   
   > >  the   
   > >  United   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> States has been received by the United States.   
   > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Article and Section?   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > First amendment.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > OK, I guess. Let's see how it breaks down.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >    
   > > > > > > > > > > > > Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment   
   > of   
   > >  religion,   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > or   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the   
   > >  freedom   
   > >  of   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > speech, or of the press; or the right of the people   
   > >  peaceably to   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > assemble, and to petition the government for a redress   
   > of   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > grievances.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >    
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment   
   > of   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > religion, or   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > prohibiting the free exercise thereof..."   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > Boobie's perfectly free to be a religious loon.   
   > Obviously a   
   > >  freedom   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > near and dear to his black little heart. Nobody's   
   > stopping   
   > >  him.   
   > >  Does   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > not apply.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > "... or abridging the freedom of speech... "   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > Boobie's perfectly free to speak, but there's no   
   > guarantee   
   > >  that   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > anyone   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > will listen. Does not apply.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > "... or of the press ..."   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > You could compare freedom of press to freedom to post   
   > >  drivel on   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > usenet   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > if you try hard enough (and boobie *does* try, bless   
   his   
   > >  neuron-free   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > head). Nobody's stopping him. Does not apply.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > "... or of the right of the people peaceably to   
   assemble   
   > >  ..."   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > No one's stopping boobie from doing this. Too bad no   
   one   
   > >  else   
   > >  wants   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > to   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > assemble with him. Does not apply.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > "... and to petition the government for a redress of   
   > >  grievances."   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > Unfortunately for him, boobie doesn't have grievances   
   > he can   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > petition   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > for redress from. He objects to abortion? Tough. The   
   > >  government   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > hasn't   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > forced him to have one, and there's nothing in the   
   > >  Constitution   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > guaranteeing him the right not to be offended or the   
   > right   
   > >  to be   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > taken   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > seriously or to have his whims obeyed by others. Now,   
   > he may   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > *think* he   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > has a grievance (this "war" of his), but I'd like to   
   see   
   > >  what   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > response   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > he'd get if he tried to petition for redress.   
   > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for your dissertation.  Now as you can see, if   
   > all   
   > > > > > > > > > > > persons   
   > > > > > > > > > > > in the United States became pro-abortion, and I was the   
   > only   
   > > > > > > > > > > > pro-life   
   > > > > > > > > > > > person left, then, the people being the government of the   
   > >  United   
   > > > > > > > > > > > States, I would be in the minority, but on the right side   
   > of   
   > >  the   
   > > > > > > > > > > > question, since all other people would have declared war   
   > on   
   > >  the   
   > > > > > > > > > > > United   
   > > > > > > > > > > > States.  That authorizes me, as the only remaining   
   > spokesman   
   > >  for   
   > > > > > > > > > > > the   
   > > > > > > > > > > > United States government to officially recognize your   
   > >  declaration   
   > > > > > > > > > > > of   
   > > > > > > > > > > > war.   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > If all dogs became cats we wouldn't need any more chewtoys.   
   > If   
   > >  my   
   > > > > > > > > > > aunt   
   > > > > > > > > > > grew testicles she'd be my uncle. And if cars could fly,   
   > they'd   
   > > > > > > > > > > become   
   > > > > > > > > > > airplanes.   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)