XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian, alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion   
   XPost: talk.atheism, us.issues.abortion   
   From: tonyofbexarremovethis@yahoo.dk   
      
   On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 12:30:30 +0200, "Warnock"    
   wrote:   
      
   >   
   >"Mark Sebree" wrote in message   
   >news:c30d43e8.0402162058.315748b5@posting.google.com...   
   >   
   snip   
   >> It may be a "worthy" idea, but not a realistic one. And those   
   >> countries where it is accepted as the "norm" are probably also ones   
   >> where the women have almost no rights. Not someplace where most   
   >> people, especially most women, would want to live.   
   >   
      
   >****** If we maintain good moral standards,   
      
   Correction: "your" moral standards not "good" moral standards.   
      
      
   >there is no reason why boys and   
   >girls can't marry - as Virgins!   
      
   Or any reason why they should.   
      
      
   >Placeswhere it is accepted, include China.   
      
   There is a wonderful place to live.   
      
      
   >   
   >> > >For another thing,   
   >> > > I'm still seeing you mention only girls, not guys.   
   >> >   
   >> > ****** We were discussing discipline for girls under 18, and whether   
   >they   
   >> > should ask their parents for permission to go to a foetus abattoir!   
   >> >   
   >>   
   >> You might want to be more specific about what you consider   
   >> "discipline". And girls should ALWAYS have a second route for a girl   
   >> to get an abortion, because all parents are not good parents, and   
   >> those girls can have a very good reason for not wanting to tell them   
   >> she is pregnant.   
   >   
      
   >****** I know it's a little old fashioned, but girls need to be raised in   
   >such a way that it is guaranteed that she will be a virgin, on her marriage   
   >night - my wife was. Boys need the same restrictions!   
      
   In your opinion. Unless they marry at the onset of puberty, or their   
   freedom is non-existent; it is not going to happen in most cases.   
   There is no objective reason why it should.   
      
      
   >Either you are going to raise your children properly, or you are going to   
   >let them raise themselves in the gutters.   
   >Good Parents, raise their children properly - and have every right to know   
   >exactly where they are at any given time and what they are doing!   
      
   One could always attach radio senders to their ankles or bring back   
   chastity belts.   
      
      
   >   
   >> And besides, they really shouldn't need their parents permission to   
   >> get an abortion.   
   >   
      
   >****** Until they leave home, they need their parents permission, just to   
   >walk to the shops on the corner!   
      
   In what universe would that be?   
      
      
   snip   
      
      
   Thomas P.   
      
   None of the Emperor's clothes had been so successful before.   
   "But he has got nothing on," said a little child.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|