XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian, alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion   
   XPost: talk.atheism, us.issues.abortion   
   From: tonyofbexarremovethis@yahoo.dk   
      
   On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 12:00:47 +0200, "Warnock"    
   wrote:   
      
   >   
   >"The Ghost In The Machine"  wrote in   
   >message news:i865g1-qet.ln1@lexi2.athghost7038suus.net...   
   >   
   >   
   >> > ****** Abortion is immoral and should be used only to save a life!   
   >>   
   >> Well, at least you're consistently evil.  Most pro-lifers, however,   
   >> want to allow abortions in case of rape or incest, which, among   
   >> other things, makes their philosophical position internally inconsistent.   
   >   
   >****** Yes, it would - but we live in an inconsistant world.   
   >   
   >> Briefly: if a child is in the womb, then it was created.  (By whom   
   >> is a side point.)  Why does it matter how?  Moral act or illegal one,   
   >> it's a kid in there; therefore, the rape exception is ridiculous.   
   >   
   >****** The rape exception is not a good argument, except that it is the only   
   >time a woman can really say that she had no part in creating this pregnancy.   
   >Ofcourse if a condom were to burst, it would be accident by misadventure!   
   >   
   >> Of course banning all abortions except to save a mother's life   
   >> would be even more ridiculous.   
   >   
   >****** It would be, 'the right thing to do!'   
   >   
      
   In your opinion.  You do not set standards for other people.  That   
   seems to be a hard concept for you to grasp.   
      
      
      
      
   Thomas P.   
      
   None of the Emperor's clothes had been so successful before.   
   "But he has got nothing on," said a little child.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)