XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian, alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion   
   XPost: talk.atheism, us.issues.abortion   
   From: ladyhawk_twonospam@hotmail.com   
      
   Warnock wrote:   
      
   > "The Ghost In The Machine"  wrote in   
   > message news:i865g1-qet.ln1@lexi2.athghost7038suus.net...   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >>>****** Abortion is immoral and should be used only to save a life!   
   >>   
   >>Well, at least you're consistently evil.  Most pro-lifers, however,   
   >>want to allow abortions in case of rape or incest, which, among   
   >>other things, makes their philosophical position internally inconsistent.   
   >   
   >   
   > ****** Yes, it would - but we live in an inconsistant world.   
   >   
   >   
   >>Briefly: if a child is in the womb, then it was created.  (By whom   
   >>is a side point.)  Why does it matter how?  Moral act or illegal one,   
   >>it's a kid in there; therefore, the rape exception is ridiculous.   
   >   
   >   
   > ****** The rape exception is not a good argument, except that it is the only   
   > time a woman can really say that she had no part in creating this pregnancy.   
      
   So you consider pregnancy as a punishment for the woman's active   
   participation in sex?   
      
   > Ofcourse if a condom were to burst, it would be accident by misadventure!   
   >   
   >   
   >>Of course banning all abortions except to save a mother's life   
   >>would be even more ridiculous.   
   >   
   >   
   > ****** It would be, 'the right thing to do!'   
   >   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)