XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism
XPost: alt.religion.christian, alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion
XPost: talk.atheism, us.issues.abortion
From: tonyofbexarremovethis@yahoo.dk
On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:45:40 +0200, "Warnock"
wrote:
>
>"Thomas P." wrote in message
>news:idft20p0oh38s76va4i9gore1lb31hqr45@4ax.com...
>
>
>> >****** I believe in right action - go full term, it's the right thing to
>do!
>>
>> It is your right to believe that. It is not your right to force it.
>>
>> >
>> >> >***** As I have just proved that God exists,
>> >>
>> >> You've only proven that you're an idiot.
>> >
>>
>> >****** You are ignoring the overwelming evidence. Some inteligence
>created
>> >you, accepy the facts.
>>
>>
>> You have provided absolutely no evidence of any creation.
>>
>> >
>> >> How many computers has God created?
>> >
>>
>> >****** All of them - God gave scientists the knowledge to build
>computers!
>>
>> You have not demonstrated the existence of any god let alone your
>> particular one. The argument in your sig merely assumes its
>> conclusion.
>
>****** Well, there is nothing else to assume, there are people, we did not
>make people, someone must have made people! Even the natural process,
>through pregnancy, requires an advanced system/being to bring it to
>fruitation.
Even after it is pointed out to you, you continue to assume your
conclusion. There is no evidence of a maker. There is no logical
necessity for one.
Thomas P.
None of the Emperor's clothes had been so successful before.
"But he has got nothing on," said a little child.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
