XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion, us.issues.abortion   
   From: sd@sd.net   
      
   rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in   
   news:7943568.0402182142.7d9d154d@posting.google.com:   
      
   > sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in message   
   > news:...   
   >> rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in message   
   >> news:<7943568.0402170649.a04fa4f@posting.google.com>...   
   >> > sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in message   
   >> > news:...   
   >> > > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in message   
   >> > > news:<7943568.0402150512.2f4e6c46@posting.google.com>...   
   >> > > > sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in message   
   >> > > > news:...   
   >> > > > > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in message   
   >> > > > > news:<7943568.0402141759.2a227f2c@posting.google.com>...   
   >> > > > > > Bob  wrote in message   
   >> > > > > > news:...   
   >> > > > > > > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in   
   >> > > > > > > news:7943568.0402140419.6da833f2@posting.google.com:   
   >> > > > > > >   
   >> > > > > > > > Bob  wrote in message   
   >> > > > > > > > news:...   
   >> > > > > > > >> rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in   
   >> > > > > > > >> news:7943568.0402121738.39e86e38@posting.google.com:   
   >> > > > > > > >>   
   >> > > > > > > >> > Bob  wrote in message   
   >> > > > > > > >> > news:...   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> William Klee  wrote in   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> news:120220041240031923%fnord2k@yahoo.com:   
   >> > > > > > > >> >>   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> > In article   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> > <7943568.0402111221.6c8e95b0@posting.google.com>,   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> > Robert B. Winn  wrote:   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> >   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> >> "Mark K. Bilbo"  wrote in   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> >> message   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> >> news:> > > > > > > >> >> >> hi>...   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > And so upon Sun, 08 Feb 2004 20:18:18 -0800   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > didst Robert B. Winn speak thusly:   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> >> >   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > > "Mark K. Bilbo"  wrote in   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > > message   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > > news:> > > > > > > >> >> >> > > ikchi>...   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > >> And so upon Sat, 07 Feb 2004 06:23:27 -0800   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > >> didst Robert B.   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > >> Winn speak thusly:   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > >>   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > >> > The only way for it to be legal would be   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > >> > for the judicial   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > >> > system to be involved.   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > >> > They were involved only by sentencing   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > >> > millions of   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > >> > Americans to death without a trial.   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > >>   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > >> It could only be legal if they were involved   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > >> but it's not legal because they were   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > >> involved?   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > >>   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > >> Is the room spinning Boobert?   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > >   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > > You cannot legally sentence Americans to   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > > death because they   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > > belong to some arbitrary classification.   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > > They all individually have the right to trial   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > > by jury.   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> >> >   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > And how many courts are paying attention to   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> >> > your interpretation of the law?   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> >>   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> >> As I understand it, all courts in the United   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> >> States at the present time are pro-abortion, and   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> >> no person who is not pro-abortion can be a judge.   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> >   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> > Your first four words explain why the rest of your   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> > post is incorrect.   
   >> > > > > > > >> >>   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> Actually, the poster forgot to insert the word   
   >> > > > > > > >> >> "don't" in those first four words.  :o))   
   >> > > > > > > >> >   
   >> > > > > > > >> > Well, since the pro-abortion faction has seen fit to   
   >> > > > > > > >> > kill 50,000,000 American children, it behooves me as   
   >> > > > > > > >> > a United States citizen to officially recognize their   
   >> > > > > > > >> > declaration of war against the United   
   >> > > > > > > >> > States.   
   >> > > > > > > >> > Robert B. winn   
   >> > > > > > > >> >   
   >> > > > > > > >> But since you effectivly admitted in other ng posts   
   >> > > > > > > >> that you cannot name even one of these 50,000,000   
   >> > > > > > > >> "children" that were killed, we can safely assume that   
   >> > > > > > > >> you are just lying again, looney toon.  You don't have   
   >> > > > > > > >> any credibility here at all.   
   >> > > > > > > >   
   >> > > > > > > > I can name all of them if it is necessary for me to do   
   >> > > > > > > > it. Robert B. Winn   
   >> > > > > > > >   
   >> > > > > > > Sure you can, looney toon, sure you can.  Just like you   
   >> > > > > > > can produce  evidence of your mythical isaiah, jesus   
   >> > > > > > > and god bs.  Like never?   
   >> > > > > >   
   >> > > > > > Well, my suggestion would be that we wait until Christ   
   >> > > > > > returns, and then you can tell him your proof that he does   
   >> > > > > > not exist. Robert B. winn   
   >> > > > >   
   >> > > > > Again you run away when you cannot support your delusions.   
   >> > > > > Why should we wait for an non-existant entity and an event   
   >> > > > > that will never happen.  You you state that Christ existed,   
   >> > > > > then it is up to you to prove it objectively.  If you state   
   >> > > > > that he will return, then you must prove it objectively.  If   
   >> > > > > you state that you can name all the born children (the only   
   >> > > > > type of children that actually exist) that have been killed by   
   >> > > > > abortions, and they number 50 million, then it is up to   
   >> > > > > you to prove it.   
   >> > > > >   
   >> > > > > So far, whenever anyone has cornered you, you try to hide   
   >> > > > > behind your mythology, as is that will protect you.  All   
   >> > > > > you do is run away.  You   
   >>   
   >> > > > > have NOTHING to base your arguments on except your opinions,   
   >> > > > > and nobody will accept your opinions as fact.   
   >> > > > >   
   >> > > > > Your religion means NOTHING to anyone that doesn't follow it.   
   >> > > > > You, for some reason, cannot accept this.  I will make this   
   >> > > > > simple.  For most of us in these abortion newsgroups that you   
   >> > > > > confront, your religious beliefs mean nothing.  We want you to   
   >> > > > > back up your assertions with cold, hard, objective facts.   
   >> > > > > Your religon is none of these things.  And your constant use   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)