XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian, alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion   
   XPost: talk.atheism, us.issues.abortion   
   From: tonyofbexarremovethis@yahoo.dk   
      
   On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 11:31:32 +0200, "Warnock"    
   wrote:   
      
   >   
   >"Thomas P." wrote in message   
   >news:mcft20pao0en5iid7k8f7o4o3v28io3nc6@4ax.com...   
   >   
   >   
   >> >> That's called reality, which is something you avoid on a quite frequent   
   >> >basis,   
   >> >> given your ranting.   
   >> >   
   >> >****** These family upsets get resolved by discussion!   
   >>   
   >> You are being dishonest again. As far as you are concerned the   
   >> conclusion has already been reached; the woman must do as you say,   
   >> i.e. no real discussion, no democracy.   
   >   
      
   >****** Discussion and respect are what win and create happiness!   
      
      
   How about respecting the woman when, after discussing the issue and   
   after a 1 to 1 vote, she decides to have an abortion? If you are not   
   able to accept that decision, you were never interested in democracy.   
      
      
   >   
   >> >> >The fact that the greatest scientists, to their utter dismay, can't   
   >> >breath   
   >> >> >life into a dead body or create a perfect animal and breath life into   
   >> >it - is   
   >> >> >PROOF of a higher intelligence!   
   >> >>   
   >> >> All it's proof of is the fact that we don't yet have all the knowledge   
   >> >needed   
   >> >> to create life.   
   >> >   
   >>   
   >> >****** I see created life, alive, all around me!! If our people can't do   
   >it,   
   >> >then obviously there is someone who can!! This someone we call God!   
   >>   
      
   >> You are assuming your conclusion. You see life all around you. What   
   >> evidence do you have that it is created?   
      
   >   
   >****** It exists, therefor it has been created!!   
      
   It exists, therefore we know it exists. We do not know it was   
   created. An argument that tries to prove the existence of god by   
   assuming that it must exist is clearly invalid.   
      
   snip   
   >> >****** Reminder: Of your 6.6 billion, over two thirds are theist - so   
   >take a   
   >> >dose of your own medicine!   
   >>   
      
   >> And a great number of those theists, including Christians, approve of   
   >> laws allowing women to decide to have an abortion.   
   >   
      
   >****** They dropped their guard, in a moment of weakness! Mainly Christians,   
   >the other theists are very touchy about it!!   
      
      
   That is your opinion. The objective fact is that many theists   
   disagree with your opinion including the majority in many countries -   
   the US for example.   
      
      
      
      
   Thomas P.   
      
   None of the Emperor's clothes had been so successful before.   
   "But he has got nothing on," said a little child.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|