XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism
XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion, us.issues.abortion
From: askme@netins.net
"Robert B. Winn" wrote in message
news:7943568.0402191741.3d06597b@posting.google.com...
> sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in message
news:...
> > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in message
news:<7943568.0402182117.5f86c542@posting.google.com>...
> > > sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in message
news:...
> > > > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in message
news:<7943568.0402170651.4687f77@posting.google.com>...
> > > > > sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in message
news:...
> > > > > > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in message
news:<7943568.0402151201.24fec16d@posting.google.com>...
> > > > > > > Christopher A. Lee wrote in message
news:...
> > > > > > > > On 15 Feb 2004 05:17:48 -0800, rbwinn47@mybluelight.com
(Robert B.
> > > > > > > > Winn) wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> And when has the US defined the fetus as a child?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >Children inside their mother's wombs were defined as
children long
> > > > > > > > >before the United States even existed. For instance, in
the King
> > > > > > > > >James version of the Bible, we find the following
scripture, Luke 2:5
> > > > > > > > > To be taxed with Mary his espoused wife, being great with
child.
> > > > > > > > > As can be seen from this scripture, Jesus Christ was a
child while
> > > > > > > > >he was inside his mother's womb, a fact recognized by the
translators
> > > > > > > > >as recently as 1611. Whether all people after that time
pretended to
> > > > > > > > >be feeble minded the way you are pretending, I would have
to take some
> > > > > > > > >time to study.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Here's a hint, moron: the bible is not part of the law of
the United
> > > > > > > > States.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Answer his question: WHEN HAS THE US DEFINED THE FETUS AS A
CHILD?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >Robert B. Winn
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Well, I don't know what you are claiming is the law of the
United
> > > > > > > States. It appears to me that you started killing children
and found
> > > > > > > out that no one was hindering you, so you are claiming that
killing
> > > > > > > children is the law of the United States. However, before you
started
> > > > > > > killing children, it was understood by all that children had
the right
> > > > > > > to live. That was the law of the land. Sorry to burst your
bubble.
> > > > > > > Robert b. winn
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Nobody has been saying that killing children is legal. Where
did you
> > > > > > get that delusion from? People have not been going around
killing
> > > > > > children. Nobody has been saying that children do not have the
right
> > > > > > to live. Killing children has never been legal in the USA, to
the
> > > > > > best of my knowledge.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sorry, but that entire post is either a heap of lies, or a
serious
> > > > > > delusion. I am not sure which. It could easily be both.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Mark Sebree
> > > > >
> > > > > Every time an abortion takes place for any reason, a child dies.
> > > >
> > > > Wrong. Abortion harms no children, much less kills them. A child
has
> > > > been born, and is defined as a human being between birth and
puberty.
> > > >
> > > > > That is what abortion is.
> > > >
> > > > Again, wrong. A abortion is a medical procedure that is designed to
> > > > correct an unwanted medical condition, namely an unwanted pregnancy.
> > > >
> > > > > Go pretend to be feeble minded to someone else.
> > > >
> > > > I leave that job to you. You are the only one that comes across as
> > > > feeble minded here.
> > > >
> > > > So, in that post, you were batting 0 for 3. Three assertions, and
> > > > none of them right. We could easily add one more to that, since you
> > > > were not addressing anything said in the previous post. You ran
away
> > > > again. No surprise there.
> > > >
> > > > Mark Sebree
> > > >
> > > > > Robert b. Winn
> > >
> > > Thank you for sharing, Mark. You have convinced me that you have the
> > > capacity to pretend to be feeble-minded.
> >
> > You have not shown anything or anyplace where I am feeble minded.
> > Rather, you have amply shown that you are.
> >
> > > Now I would appreciate it if
> > > you would go pretend to be feeble-minded to someone else.
> >
> > Tied of losing the debates, because you cannot back up your rediculous
> > assertions?
> >
> > > Could you do that for me?
> > > Robert b. Winn
> >
> > Not as long as you make ridiculous assertions, and try to deny people
> > their rights. I will keep making you run away, and showing people
> > your feeble mindedness and oppressive agenda as long as you keep
> > insisting to do so. I will keep highlighting your lies, and I will
> > keep blocking your attempts to force others to accept your opinion as
> > fact.
> >
> > As long as you seek to enslave and torture women by forcing them to
> > endure unwanted pregnancies, I will oppose you and all people like
> > you.
> >
> > And you have to continue to contend with an honest, strong willed,
> > intelligent, educated opponent that you cannot browbeat or bullshit.
> >
> > Deal with it.
> >
> > Mark Sebree
>
>
> You are a spineless adulterer. That is about the extent of it. Go
> pretend that you are feeble minded to someone else.
> Robert B. winn
Wow, what a liar Robert B. whine is.
He's definitely not a good role model for anyone watching at home.
On a side note, adulterer is a Latin based word, BobBwinn.
MrD
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
