XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian, alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion   
   XPost: us.issues.abortion   
   From: junegill@btinternet.com   
      
   "Robert B. Winn" wrote in message   
   news:7943568.0402192005.42f59a72@posting.google.com...   
   > "junegill" wrote in message   
   news:...   
   > > "Mark Sebree" wrote in message   
   > > news:c30d43e8.0402191126.36b9832a@posting.google.com...   
   > > > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in message   
   > > news:<7943568.0402182143.4ae00317@posting.google.com>...   
   > >   
   > > [snip]   
   > >   
   > > > > Go sell it somewhere else. I am not interested.   
   > > > > Robert B. Winn   
   > > >   
   > > > Yes, we know that you don't like facing the truth. However, as long   
   > > > as you keep trying to peddle your lies and your oppressive agenda, I   
   > > > will keep countering you with the truth and with facts.   
   > > >   
   > > > You keep running away, and you don't want to deal with people that you   
   > > > cannot browbeat and bullshit. However, Usenet is a series of open   
   > > > forums, and that is what you are going to come up against. If you   
   > > > cannot defend your assertions, you will lose. If you keep trying to   
   > > > run away and divert attention away from the fact that you cannot   
   > > > support your assertions and agenda, people will see it and point it   
   > > > out to others, while trying to draw you back on topic. Your religion   
   > > > and religious beliefs mean nothing to anyone else, and are not   
   > > > considered sufficient basis to impose hardship on millions of women.   
   > > > Your blatent lies and ad hominem attacks only help to highlight the   
   > > > weakness of your agenda and opinions.   
   > > >   
   > > > You are your own worst enemy here.   
   > > >   
   > > > You may not be interested in what I have to say, but others are. You   
   > > > can ignore me, but you cannot get rid of me. And I can and will show   
   > > > the weaknesses of your agenda, and point out your feeble attempts to   
   > > > run away from providing objective support for your agenda.   
   > > >   
   > > > Mark Sebree   
   > >   
   > > Bravo, Mark.   
   >   
   > One thing about Mark, he is not afraid to expend energy in being   
   > ineffective.   
      
   You're not capable of judging his effectiveness, because it's clear that you   
   don't understand a fraction of what he posts.   
      
   > You know what I think? I think adulterers like Mark are the ones who   
   > impose hardships on women.   
   > Robert B. Winn   
      
   Really? Got any proof that he's an adulterer? And what hardships does he   
   impose on women, when he clearly never tries to interfere with their right   
   to make their own decisions?   
      
   --   
   June G   
   # 364   
   http://uk.geocities.com/junegill@btopenworld.com/webpages/index.html.html   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|