XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian, alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion   
   XPost: talk.atheism, us.issues.abortion   
   From: warnnock@pop.co.za   
      
   "Thomas P."  wrote in message   
   news:ubf8301i7dlh7vf0ibh44otdno8m6qvf1k@4ax.com...   
      
      
   > >****** Equal rights should mean that if she wants an abortion, we both   
   have   
   > >an equal say.   
   >   
   > That is impossible.  It is also an example of your dishonesty, because   
   > you have indicated more than once that, in the case of a disagreement,   
   > you would accept only one conclusion.  In other words you do not want   
   > an "equal say"; you want the final word.   
      
   ****** Let's be fair, if there are two people and you have a split vote -   
   how do you resolve it? There's no intrinsic reason why the woman should have   
   the casting vote, nor the man. So we have to allow 'right action' to have   
   the casting vote.   
      
   --   
   **** The fact that the greatest scientists, to their utter dismay, can't   
   breath life into a dead body or create a perfect animal and breath life into   
   it - is PROOF of a higher intelligence! ****   
      
   ** People who deny that there is a God, are not so convinced that no God   
   exists, but are using this denial as a crutch to get out of having to comply   
   with God's Law!**   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)