XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian, alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion   
   XPost: us.issues.abortion   
   From: askme@netins.net   
      
   "Robert B. Winn"  wrote in message   
   news:7943568.0402192005.42f59a72@posting.google.com...   
   > "junegill"  wrote in message   
   news:...   
   > > "Mark Sebree"  wrote in message   
   > > news:c30d43e8.0402191126.36b9832a@posting.google.com...   
   > > > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in message   
   > > news:<7943568.0402182143.4ae00317@posting.google.com>...   
   > >   
   > > [snip]   
   > >   
   > > > > Go sell it somewhere else.  I am not interested.   
   > > > > Robert B. Winn   
   > > >   
   > > > Yes, we know that you don't like facing the truth.  However, as long   
   > > > as you keep trying to peddle your lies and your oppressive agenda, I   
   > > > will keep countering you with the truth and with facts.   
   > > >   
   > > > You keep running away, and you don't want to deal with people that you   
   > > > cannot browbeat and bullshit.  However, Usenet is a series of open   
   > > > forums, and that is what you are going to come up against.  If you   
   > > > cannot defend your assertions, you will lose.  If you keep trying to   
   > > > run away and divert attention away from the fact that you cannot   
   > > > support your assertions and agenda, people will see it and point it   
   > > > out to others, while trying to draw you back on topic.  Your religion   
   > > > and religious beliefs mean nothing to anyone else, and are not   
   > > > considered sufficient basis to impose hardship on millions of women.   
   > > > Your blatent lies and ad hominem attacks only help to highlight the   
   > > > weakness of your agenda and opinions.   
   > > >   
   > > > You are your own worst enemy here.   
   > > >   
   > > > You may not be interested in what I have to say, but others are.  You   
   > > > can ignore me, but you cannot get rid of me.  And I can and will show   
   > > > the weaknesses of your agenda, and point out your feeble attempts to   
   > > > run away from providing objective support for your agenda.   
   > > >   
   > > > Mark Sebree   
   > >   
   > > Bravo, Mark.   
   >   
   > One thing about Mark, he is not afraid to expend energy in being   
   > ineffective.   
      
   He's been very effective in his arguments against your position.  He's   
   certainly given me new inspiration.   
   You, on the other hand, have been negatively effective, making me dislike   
   anti-choice position holders based on you as a role model.   
   You've even held youself up as greater than God lately!   
      
   > You know what I think?  I think adulterers like Mark are the ones who   
   > impose hardships on women.   
      
   It would appear that you are quite ineffective in your thought process as   
   well.   
   MrD   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)