XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion, us.issues.abortion   
   From: fnord2k@yahoo.com   
      
   In article <7943568.0402200544.2b73e786@posting.google.com>, Robert B.   
   Winn  wrote:   
      
   > William Klee  wrote in message   
   > news:<190220041941019847%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...   
   > > In article <7943568.0402182112.23ff9c8@posting.google.com>, Robert B.   
   > > Winn  wrote:   
   > >   
   > > > William Klee  wrote in message   
   > > > news:<0e604e7cfeecfb60646d75b65f6b5e71@news.teranews.com>...   
   > > > > In article <7943568.0402170647.6b3d8071@posting.google.com>, Robert B.   
   > > > > Winn  wrote:   
   > > > >   
   > > > > > William Klee  wrote in message   
   > > > > > news:<150220041533545900%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...   
   > > > > > > In article <7943568.0402150536.471e4c4@posting.google.com>, Robert   
   > > > > > > B.   
   > > > > > > Winn  wrote:   
   > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't see why a fictional woman couldn't have a   
   > >  fictional   
   > >  child,   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > but   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > until it's born, it's a fictional fetus.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What a surprise.  Why don't you go   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > pretend that you are feeble minded to someone   
   > else.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't need to. You're doing a bang-up job all by   
   > >  yourself.   
   > >  *If*   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you're pretending, which is doubtful.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, as I predicted, you continue to claim that you   
   > do   
   > >  not   
   > >  know   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > what   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > a child is.  Let's see how blue in the face you can   
   > get.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > Let's see where I claimed I didn't know what a child   
   is.   
   > >  Oops, I   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > *didn't* claim that. If there is a jesus, he's not   
   happy   
   > >  about   
   > >  all   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > your   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > lying, boobie.   
   > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > Right here.  Remember this scripture?  Luke 2:5  To be   
   > taxed   
   > >  with   
   > > > > > > > > > > > Mary   
   > > > > > > > > > > > his espoused wife, being great with child.   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > Non-sequitor, boobie. If you can't back up your wild   
   > claims, be   
   > >  a   
   > > > > > > > > > > man   
   > > > > > > > > > > and admit it. Or be a christian and lie about it; your   
   > choice.   
   > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > Well, was Jesus Christ a child when he was in his mother's   
   > womb?   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > Who cares?   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > The   
   > > > > > > > > > scripture says he was.   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > The scripture also says slavery is just fine and that women and   
   > > > > > > > > children are property. Your point?   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > Well, obviously you do not want to discuss this scripture.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > What's to discuss? Your bible says slavery is just fine and that   
   > > > > > > women   
   > > > > > > are children are property. Your point?   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > We will try again later.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > No, you will post non-sequitors, and I will try to nail your   
   > > > > > > jelly-like   
   > > > > > > "position" into something solid.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > Yes, you have stated before that you cannot tell what a child is.  I   
   > > > >   
   > > > > More lies, boobie. You can *not* show that I have said that, because I   
   > > > > have *never* said that.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > > do not believe you.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > I do not believe you can read.   
   > > >   
   > > > Thank you for sharing, Bob.   
   > >   
   > > My name's not Bob, boobie, it's William. It's at the top of the post   
   > > you non-sequitored to. You *really* need to get yourself enrolled in   
   > > that Adult Literacy program, pronto.   
   >   
   > Are you sure it is not Bob?   
      
   Quite sure, Captain Non-Sequitor, although I'm sure you *need* it to be   
   for some obscure psychological reason. Probably stemming from your   
   absolute refusal to admit the possibility that you're wrong on any   
   topic.   
      
   --   
   ...and in elder days there were wars in the Heavens between the Ibemmeraphim   
   and the Angels of the Apple of Knowledge...   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)