XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian, alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion   
   XPost: talk.atheism, us.issues.abortion   
   From: ladyhawk_twonospam@hotmail.com   
      
   Warnock wrote:   
      
   > "Thomas P."  wrote in message   
   > news:ubf8301i7dlh7vf0ibh44otdno8m6qvf1k@4ax.com...   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >>>****** Equal rights should mean that if she wants an abortion, we both   
   >   
   > have   
   >   
   >>>an equal say.   
   >>   
   >>That is impossible.  It is also an example of your dishonesty, because   
   >>you have indicated more than once that, in the case of a disagreement,   
   >>you would accept only one conclusion.  In other words you do not want   
   >>an "equal say"; you want the final word.   
   >   
   >   
   > ****** Let's be fair, if there are two people and you have a split vote -   
   > how do you resolve it? There's no intrinsic reason why the woman should have   
   > the casting vote, nor the man. So we have to allow 'right action' to have   
   > the casting vote.   
      
   And in that case, the woman's desired action would be the right action.   
      
   > --   
   > **** The fact that the greatest scientists, to their utter dismay, can't   
   > breath life into a dead body or create a perfect animal and breath life into   
   > it - is PROOF of a higher intelligence! ****   
   >   
   > ** People who deny that there is a God, are not so convinced that no God   
   > exists, but are using this denial as a crutch to get out of having to comply   
   > with God's Law!**   
   >   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)