XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian, alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion   
   XPost: talk.atheism, us.issues.abortion   
      
   "Warnock"  wrote in   
   news:c15mgo$68c$11@ctb-nnrp2.saix.net:   
      
   >   
   > "Thomas P."  wrote in message   
   > news:ubf8301i7dlh7vf0ibh44otdno8m6qvf1k@4ax.com...   
   >   
   >   
   >> >****** Equal rights should mean that if she wants an abortion, we   
   >> >both   
   > have   
   >> >an equal say.   
   >>   
   >> That is impossible.  It is also an example of your dishonesty,   
   >> because you have indicated more than once that, in the case of a   
   >> disagreement, you would accept only one conclusion.  In other words   
   >> you do not want an "equal say"; you want the final word.   
   >   
   > ****** Let's be fair, if there are two people and you have a split   
   > vote - how do you resolve it? There's no intrinsic reason why the   
   > woman should have the casting vote, nor the man. So we have to allow   
   > 'right action' to have the casting vote.   
   >   
   One woman, one vote, no exceptions.   
      
   > --   
   > **** The fact that the greatest scientists, to their utter dismay,   
   > can't breath life into a dead body or create a perfect animal and   
   > breath life into it - is PROOF of a higher intelligence! ****   
   >   
   > ** People who deny that there is a God, are not so convinced that no   
   > God exists, but are using this denial as a crutch to get out of having   
   > to comply with God's Law!**   
   >   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)