XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian, alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion   
   XPost: talk.atheism, us.issues.abortion   
   From: plasmatron@sickof.spam   
      
   In alt.atheism Warnock  wrote:   
      
   > "The Plasmatron"  wrote in message   
   > news:c0qbc0$2i2$6@coward.ks.cc.utah.edu...   
      
      
   >> > ****** Nothing wrong with that, they used up their FREE CHOICE, when   
   > they   
   >> > slept with a man!   
   >>   
   >>     Since I don't have the rest of your debate to look at I'll hope that   
   >> you've already excluded rape, incest, and other forms of coercion,   
   >> otherwise you're obviously wrong from the get go.   
      
   > ****** The only really good reason to go to a foetus abattoir, is to save   
   > the woman's life! But, secondary reasons may include rape & coercion.   
      
       Oh BS.  Why not end it's life?  Before it has a brain how can it   
   possibly have a mind or a soul living in it yet?  What good reason is   
   there to force a woman to keep it growing inside her until it does grow a   
   brain?  Is there something that gives little lumps of flesh a right to   
   turn into a child?  If so why does God choose to cause more than 50% of   
   pregnancies to miscarry, the vast majority so early on that the woman   
   probably didn't even realize she was pregnant?  If not then why should a   
   woman's right to end a pregnancy be curtailed?   
       Also if little lumps of cells with no brain have rights then where   
   does it end?  Does every egg cell in every woman have a right to be   
   fertilized?  Does every sperm have a right to combine with an egg?   
      
   >>     So, now we just have the fact that until there is some brain   
   >> development you're dealing with just a mass of cells, not a human   
   >> being, so why shouldn't a woman have the right to have the little   
   >> parasite removed if she doesn't want it to eventually become a   
   >> human being?   
      
   > ****** Well to start with it's God's creation - appologies to atheists!   
      
       Really?  So it's God she had sex with, not just some guy?  So why   
   doesn't god keep his dick in his pants and not create children inside of   
   women who aren't ready for the responsibilities?   
      
       In all seriousness though, it's the woman's body that is creating the   
   child, not God, even if God is the guy who got her pregnant.  That would   
   just mean he provided half the blueprints for the child.  It's still the   
   woman's body that creates the child.   
      
   >> > "Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level then beat   
   >> > you with experience."   
   >>   
   >>     Good advice, but I'll argue with you anyway.  I am doing this for   
   >> pure entertainment, not social status.   
      
   > ****** You are welcome, at least you are civil! Might even make a theist out   
   > of you yet.::))   
      
       You paid little attention to the other posts of mine you've answered.   
   I am a theist.  To be specific I am a deist.   
      
   --   
   The Left Reverend Plasmatron at hotpop com   
   "Never express yourself more clearly than you are able to think"   
    - Niels Bohr   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)