XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion, us.issues.abortion   
   From: fnord2k@yahoo.com   
      
   In article <7943568.0402201707.5e7597@posting.google.com>, Robert B.   
   Winn  wrote:   
      
   > sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in message   
   > news:...   
   > > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn)   
   > > > > Well, we already knew that you had no interest in the facts.  I am   
   > > > > just highlighting how weak and pathetic your arguments are, as will as   
   > > > > showing that you continue to run away from objective challenges to   
   > > > > your absurd statements.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > >  Go pretend that you are feeble minded to someone else.   
   > > > > > Robert B. Womm   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Sorry, you are the only one that is feeble minded here.  If you cannot   
   > > > > handle an intelligent and educated debator that you cannot browbeat or   
   > > > > bullshit, stay out of the deep end of the debating pool.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Again, you run away.  You have consistantly refused to back up your   
   > > > > own assertions with anything other than your personal opinion.  And   
   > > > > you seem to think that your religion counts for something in this type   
   > > > > of debate.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > As long as you make oppressive and ridiculous assertions, and demand   
   > > > > that women be enslaved and tortured simply because they are pregnant   
   > > > > and do not wish to be, I can and will counter you, and show your   
   > > > > arguments to have no substance.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > You can ignore me, but you cannot dismiss me.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Mark Sebree   
   > > >   
   > > > Sure I can.  You are dismissed because you are an adulterer.   
   > > > Robert B. Winn   
   > >   
   > > You have never objectively shown me to be an adulterer.  And religious   
   > > and personal beliefs of the matter have no place in this discussion,   
   > > since the topic is secular.  After all, why should I care what   
   > > superstitious nonsense you belief in?   
   > >   
   > > It is just another of your ad hominem attacks.  What's more, you are   
   > > running away again.  I asked you for specific information in my post   
   > > that you stated that you had, and you did not answer.  All you are   
   > > doing is calling me names because you cannot handle an intelligent,   
   > > educated, and knowledgable debator.  When you are confronted by   
   > > someone that you cannot browbeat or bullshit, you run away.   
   > >   
   > > All you are doing is showing how weak you postion actually is.  And   
   > > you are showing everyone how spineless you are.  You call people names   
   > > and then run away, like a schoolyard bully when people finally stand   
   > > up to him.   
   > >   
   > > If you don't want to debate, don't jump into the deep end of Usenet.   
   > > You will be eaten alive.  As you well know, given the number of times   
   > > it has happened to you.   
   > >   
   > > Mark Sebree   
   >   
   > I said you were an adulterer.  I do not need to back that up with   
   > anything, do I?   
      
   Yes. Otherwise, I am equally entitled to call you a pedophile and a   
   terrorist.   
      
   > You have all of the information you need to know   
   > whether I told the truth when I said that or not.   
      
   That would be your posts, compared to reality. Sucks to be you.   
      
   > You people are   
   > about as deep as a septic tank.   
      
   From you, that's a compliment.   
      
   --   
   ...and in elder days there were wars in the Heavens between the Ibemmeraphim   
   and the Angels of the Apple of Knowledge...   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)