XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion, us.issues.abortion   
   From: fnord2k@yahoo.com   
      
   In article <7943568.0402210631.24f34faf@posting.google.com>, Robert B.   
   Winn  wrote:   
      
   > sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in message   
   > news:...   
   > > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in message   
   > > news:<7943568.0402201707.5e7597@posting.google.com>...   
   > > > sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in message   
   > > > news:...   
   > > > > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn)   
   > > > > > > Well, we already knew that you had no interest in the facts.  I am   
   > > > > > > just highlighting how weak and pathetic your arguments are, as will   
   > > > > > > as   
   > > > > > > showing that you continue to run away from objective challenges to   
   > > > > > > your absurd statements.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > >  Go pretend that you are feeble minded to someone else.   
   > > > > > > > Robert B. Womm   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > Sorry, you are the only one that is feeble minded here.  If you   
   > > > > > > cannot   
   > > > > > > handle an intelligent and educated debator that you cannot browbeat   
   > > > > > > or   
   > > > > > > bullshit, stay out of the deep end of the debating pool.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > Again, you run away.  You have consistantly refused to back up your   
   > > > > > > own assertions with anything other than your personal opinion.  And   
   > > > > > > you seem to think that your religion counts for something in this   
   > > > > > > type   
   > > > > > > of debate.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > As long as you make oppressive and ridiculous assertions, and   
   demand   
   > > > > > > that women be enslaved and tortured simply because they are   
   pregnant   
   > > > > > > and do not wish to be, I can and will counter you, and show your   
   > > > > > > arguments to have no substance.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > You can ignore me, but you cannot dismiss me.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > Mark Sebree   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > Sure I can.  You are dismissed because you are an adulterer.   
   > > > > > Robert B. Winn   
   > > > >   
   > > > > You have never objectively shown me to be an adulterer.  And religious   
   > > > > and personal beliefs of the matter have no place in this discussion,   
   > > > > since the topic is secular.  After all, why should I care what   
   > > > > superstitious nonsense you belief in?   
   > > > >   
   > > > > It is just another of your ad hominem attacks.  What's more, you are   
   > > > > running away again.  I asked you for specific information in my post   
   > > > > that you stated that you had, and you did not answer.  All you are   
   > > > > doing is calling me names because you cannot handle an intelligent,   
   > > > > educated, and knowledgable debator.  When you are confronted by   
   > > > > someone that you cannot browbeat or bullshit, you run away.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > All you are doing is showing how weak you postion actually is.  And   
   > > > > you are showing everyone how spineless you are.  You call people names   
   > > > > and then run away, like a schoolyard bully when people finally stand   
   > > > > up to him.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > If you don't want to debate, don't jump into the deep end of Usenet.   
   > > > > You will be eaten alive.  As you well know, given the number of times   
   > > > > it has happened to you.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Mark Sebree   
   > > >   
   > > > I said you were an adulterer.   
   > >   
   > > Yes, you did.   
   > >   
   > > >  I do not need to back that up with   
   > > > anything, do I?   
   > >   
   > > Yes, you do.  You make such an accusation, you need to support it.   
   > > All that is so far is an unsupported accusation, one that many people   
   > > would consider slanderous, or more properly since this is effectively   
   > > a print forum, libelous.   
   > >   
   > > >  You have all of the information you need to know   
   > > > whether I told the truth when I said that or not.   
   > >   
   > > Yes, and you have lied about it.  I am not an adulterer.  And you have   
   > > failed to show that I am.   
   > >   
   > > >  You people are   
   > > > about as deep as a septic tank.   
   > > > Robert B. winn   
   > >   
   > > Well, that beats you.  You have no depth at all.  Although your   
   > > debating style does stink far worse than any septic tank ever could.   
   > >   
   > > Mark Sebree   
   >   
   > I am not debating.   
      
   You're telling the truth for a change. See, that wasn't hard, was it?   
   You're not debating, you're just running at the keyboard.   
      
   > So far you have told me three things.  1.  You are   
   > capable of pretending that you do not know what a child is.   
      
   You can't back that up, of course, so you're lying again. And you had   
   started off so well...   
      
   > 2.  You   
   > are going to keep pretending that you do not know what a pregnant   
   > woman has in her womb.   
      
   You can't back that up, either, so another lie on your balance.   
      
   > 3.  You are an adulterer.   
      
   And you can't back this up either, so that's three lies in three   
   sentences.   
      
   >    You do not like it when I tell you what you have said so far.   
      
   Before anyone can like or dislike anything you tell them they've said,   
   you have to say what they actually said. Something you have yet to do.   
      
   >    Too   
   > bad.  Go bother someone else with your attempts to prove that you are   
   > feeble minded.   
      
   You were looking in the mirror when you typed that last line, weren't   
   you.   
      
   --   
   ...and in elder days there were wars in the Heavens between the Ibemmeraphim   
   and the Angels of the Apple of Knowledge...   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)