XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion, us.issues.abortion   
   From: askme@netins.net   
      
   "Robert B. Winn" wrote in message   
   news:7943568.0402211251.6c8ed650@posting.google.com...   
   > "MrD Pstychologist \(retired\)" wrote in message   
   news:...   
   > > "Robert B. Winn" wrote in message   
   > > news:7943568.0402200541.4584bc61@posting.google.com...   
   > > > "MrD Pstychologist \(retired\)" wrote in message   
   > > news:...   
   > > > > "Robert B. Winn" wrote in message   
   > > > > news:7943568.0402191741.3d06597b@posting.google.com...   
   > > > > > sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in message   
   > > news:...   
   > > > > > > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in message   
   > > news:<7943568.0402182117.5f86c542@posting.google.com>...   
   > > > > > > > sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in message   
   > > news:...   
   > > > > > > > > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in message   
   > > news:<7943568.0402170651.4687f77@posting.google.com>...   
   > > > > > > > > > sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in message   
   > > news:...   
   > > > > > > > > > > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in   
   message   
   > > news:<7943568.0402151201.24fec16d@posting.google.com>...   
   > > > > > > > > > > > Christopher A. Lee wrote in   
   message   
   > > news:...   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > On 15 Feb 2004 05:17:48 -0800,   
   rbwinn47@mybluelight.com   
   > > (Robert B.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > Winn) wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >> And when has the US defined the fetus as a child?   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >Children inside their mother's wombs were defined   
   as   
   > > children long   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >before the United States even existed. For   
   instance,   
   > > in   
   > > the King   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >James version of the Bible, we find the following   
   > > scripture, Luke 2:5   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > To be taxed with Mary his espoused wife, being   
   great   
   > > with   
   > > child.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > As can be seen from this scripture, Jesus Christ   
   was   
   > > a   
   > > child while   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >he was inside his mother's womb, a fact recognized   
   by   
   > > the   
   > > translators   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >as recently as 1611. Whether all people after that   
   > > time   
   > > pretended to   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >be feeble minded the way you are pretending, I   
   would   
   > > have   
   > > to take some   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >time to study.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > Here's a hint, moron: the bible is not part of the   
   law   
   > > of   
   > > the United   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > States.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > Answer his question: WHEN HAS THE US DEFINED THE   
   FETUS   
   > > AS A   
   > > CHILD?   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >Robert B. Winn   
   > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > Well, I don't know what you are claiming is the law of   
   the   
   > > United   
   > > > > > > > > > > > States. It appears to me that you started killing   
   > > children   
   > > and found   
   > > > > > > > > > > > out that no one was hindering you, so you are claiming   
   > > that   
   > > killing   
   > > > > > > > > > > > children is the law of the United States. However,   
   before   
   > > you   
   > > started   
   > > > > > > > > > > > killing children, it was understood by all that   
   children   
   > > had   
   > > the right   
   > > > > > > > > > > > to live. That was the law of the land. Sorry to   
   burst   
   > > your   
   > > bubble.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > Robert b. winn   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > Nobody has been saying that killing children is legal.   
   > > Where   
   > > did you   
   > > > > > > > > > > get that delusion from? People have not been going   
   around   
   > > killing   
   > > > > > > > > > > children. Nobody has been saying that children do not   
   have   
   > > the   
   > > right   
   > > > > > > > > > > to live. Killing children has never been legal in the   
   USA,   
   > > to   
   > > the   
   > > > > > > > > > > best of my knowledge.   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > Sorry, but that entire post is either a heap of lies, or   
   a   
   > > serious   
   > > > > > > > > > > delusion. I am not sure which. It could easily be   
   both.   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > Mark Sebree   
   > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > Every time an abortion takes place for any reason, a child   
   > > dies.   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > Wrong. Abortion harms no children, much less kills them. A   
   > > child   
   > > has   
   > > > > > > > > been born, and is defined as a human being between birth and   
   > > puberty.   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > That is what abortion is.   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > Again, wrong. A abortion is a medical procedure that is   
   > > designed to   
   > > > > > > > > correct an unwanted medical condition, namely an unwanted   
   > > pregnancy.   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > Go pretend to be feeble minded to someone else.   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > I leave that job to you. You are the only one that comes   
   across   
   > > as   
   > > > > > > > > feeble minded here.   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > So, in that post, you were batting 0 for 3. Three   
   assertions,   
   > > and   
   > > > > > > > > none of them right. We could easily add one more to that,   
   since   
   > > you   
   > > > > > > > > were not addressing anything said in the previous post. You   
   ran   
   > > away   
   > > > > > > > > again. No surprise there.   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > Mark Sebree   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > Robert b. Winn   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > Thank you for sharing, Mark. You have convinced me that you   
   have   
   > > the   
   > > > > > > > capacity to pretend to be feeble-minded.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > You have not shown anything or anyplace where I am feeble   
   minded.   
   > > > > > > Rather, you have amply shown that you are.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > Now I would appreciate it if   
   > > > > > > > you would go pretend to be feeble-minded to someone else.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > Tied of losing the debates, because you cannot back up your   
   > > rediculous   
   > > > > > > assertions?   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > Could you do that for me?   
   > > > > > > > Robert b. Winn   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > Not as long as you make ridiculous assertions, and try to deny   
   > > people   
   > > > > > > their rights. I will keep making you run away, and showing   
   people   
   > > > > > > your feeble mindedness and oppressive agenda as long as you keep   
   > > > > > > insisting to do so. I will keep highlighting your lies, and I   
   will   
   > > > > > > keep blocking your attempts to force others to accept your   
   opinion   
   > > as   
   > > > > > > fact.   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|