XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion, us.issues.abortion   
   From: askme@netins.net   
      
   "Robert B. Winn" wrote in message   
   news:7943568.0402210637.49bf3ab6@posting.google.com...   
   > "MrD Pstychologist \(retired\)" wrote in message   
   news:...   
   > > "Robert B. Winn" wrote in message   
   > > news:7943568.0402201629.ce475c4@posting.google.com...   
   > > > "MrD Pstychologist \(retired\)" wrote in message   
   > > news:...   
   > > > > "Robert B. Winn" wrote in message   
   > > > > news:7943568.0402200552.3d55e23e@posting.google.com...   
   > > > > > "MrD Pstychologist \(retired\)" wrote in   
   message   
   > > news:...   
   > > > > > > "Mark Sebree" wrote in message   
   > > > > > > news:c30d43e8.0402181406.519d59bd@posting.google.com...   
   > > > > > > > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in message   
   > > news:<7943568.0402171639.325a07c6@posting.google.com>...   
   > > > > > > > > sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in message   
   > > news:...   
   > > > > > > > > > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in message   
   > > news:<7943568.0402150533.246ff8c8@posting.google.com>...   
   > > > > > > > > > > sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in message   
   > > news:...   
   > > > > > > > > > > > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in   
   message   
   > > news:<7943568.0402131727.1a9e4b1e@posting.google.com>...   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > William Klee wrote in message   
   > > news:<130220041336300785%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > In article   
   > > ,   
   > > Attila   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 09:54:27 -0600, "Mark K.   
   Bilbo"   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in alt.abortion with   
   message-id   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >    
   > > wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >And so upon Fri, 13 Feb 2004 04:13:13 -0600   
   didst   
   > > William Klee speak   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >thusly:   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> In article   
   > > <7943568.0402121806.1ea4e0e5@posting.google.com>, Robert B.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Winn wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Well, I am not sure what he wrote in, but he   
   was   
   > > aware that there   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> would be other languages besides the one he   
   > > used.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> You also claim that even though he didn't   
   write   
   > > what   
   > > you claim he   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> wrote, he *meant* what you claim he wrote   
   because   
   > > he   
   > > knew you'd be   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> reading it in English someday. That's funny,   
   in a   
   > > pathetic sort of way.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >What's even funnier is Boobert admitting he   
   really   
   > > doesn't understand   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >this thing about the bible being written in   
   other   
   > > languages.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >I'd bet money he really does *not understand   
   > > that...   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > He probably can't understand other languages.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > I wouldn't claim he can understand English.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, let's concentrate on one English word. What   
   does   
   > > the   
   > > word child mean?   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > Robert b. winn   
   > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > A person between birth an puberty.   
   > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > Someone who is acting childish (You, for example).   
   > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > Mark Sebree   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > So what do you think the word child means in this   
   scripture?   
   > > > > > > > > > > Luke 2:5 To be taxed with Mary his espoused wife,   
   being   
   > > great   
   > > with child.   
   > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > That Mary was pregnant. That is what the idiom "with   
   child"   
   > > means,   
   > > > > > > > > > and that is what the latin says. Your opinion on the   
   matter   
   > > has   
   > > no   
   > > > > > > > > > bearing on reality.   
   > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > By the way, we already know that the KJV is a poor   
   > > translation.   
   > > You   
   > > > > > > > > > don't have to keep tellinf us this.   
   > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > Jesus Christ seems to have been a child while he was in   
   his   
   > > mother's womb.   
   > > > > > > > > > > Robert B. winn   
   > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > Only in your fevered imagination. In reality, assuming   
   that   
   > > Jesus   
   > > > > > > > > > actually existed, at the time, he was a fetus. He did not   
   > > become   
   > > a   
   > > > > > > > > > child until his birth.   
   > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > Let us know when you will be joining us in the real world.   
   > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > Mark Sebree   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > Good thing we have the Bible to tell us what a child is,   
   right?   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > Here's one thing the bible says about conception:   
   > > > > > > Leviticus 12:2 Speak unto the children of Israel, saying, If a   
   woman   
   > > > > > > have conceived seed, and born a man child: then she shall be   
   unclean   
   > > > > > > seven days; according to the days of the separation for her   
   > > infirmity   
   > > > > > > shall she be unclean.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > The bible calls it 'conceived seed'. It's not a man child til   
   it's   
   > > > > > > born.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > To be fair, Luke says a babe leapt in the womb (Luke 1:41) and   
   also   
   > > says   
   > > > > > > later (Luke 2:12) the babe was wrapped in swaddling clothes..   
   This   
   > > > > > > isn't the same term that they use for child though, in the greek   
   of   
   > > the   
   > > > > > > New Testament, there is a difference.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > Who cares what the Bible says? We live in a secular world.   
   You   
   > > could   
   > > > > > > > also be saying "Good thing that the Sutras tell us what a   
   child   
   > > is."   
   > > > > > > > Or the Eddas, or any other religious writings.   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > Religious definions have no place in the secular world. Also,   
   I   
   > > have   
   > > > > > > > not seen state and back up your assertion. That verse from   
   Luke   
   > > that   
   > > > > > > > you love so much is a sloppy translation that uses an idiom   
   for   
   > > > > > > > "pregnant". You cannot accept that all the verse says is that   
   > > Mary   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|