XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian, alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion   
   XPost: talk.atheism   
   From: tonyofbexarremovethis@yahoo.dk   
      
   On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 12:41:15 +0200, "Warnock"    
   wrote:   
      
   >   
   >"Ray Fischer"  wrote in message   
   >news:c144cr$2kr$1@bolt.sonic.net...   
   >   
   >   
   >> >> >> > ***** Marriage joins two people together into one - they should   
   >> >> >> > vote as one on all family issues!!   
   >> >> >>   
   >> >> >> so you will vote as your spouse tells you to vote 100% of the time,   
   >> >> >> right?   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> > ****** There would be a discussion, then we vote as one.   
   >> >>   
   >> >> And if she doesn't agree, whose vote prevails?   
   >> >   
   >> >****** Right action and the higher moral ground must prevail!   
   >>   
   >> And since you're not moral, obviously people shouldn't listen to you.   
   >> --   
   >> Ray Fischer   
   >> rfischer@sonic.net   
   >   
   >****** As far as morality is concerned, your position is precarious!   
   >   
      
   It is obvious that you define morals as an absolute set of rules   
   approved of by you.    When asked for justification for one of your   
   "commandments", your answer is we need "high moral standards"; as if   
   that settled matters.  It doesn't.   
      
      
      
      
      
      
   Thomas P.   
      
   None of the Emperor's clothes had been so successful before.   
   "But he has got nothing on," said a little child.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)