XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion, us.issues.abortion   
   From: fnord2k@yahoo.com   
      
   In article <7943568.0402230501.416e270e@posting.google.com>, Robert B.   
   Winn  wrote:   
      
   > William Klee  wrote in message   
   > news:<220220042135029653%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...   
   > > In article <7943568.0402221543.28c01f7c@posting.google.com>, Robert B.   
   > > Winn  wrote:   
   > >   
   > > > William Klee  wrote in message   
   > > > news:<220220040009512572%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...   
   > > > > In article <7943568.0402211945.2b6d273c@posting.google.com>, Robert B.   
   > > > > Winn  wrote:   
   > > > >   
   > > > > > William Klee  wrote in message   
   > > > > > news:<210220041441219325%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...   
   > > > > > > In article <7943568.0402210624.6ea79ce2@posting.google.com>, Robert   
   > > > > > > B.   
   > > > > > > Winn  wrote:   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > William Klee  wrote in message   
   > > > > > > > news:<200220042216380581%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...   
   > > > > > > > > In article <7943568.0402201636.63b1c6d0@posting.google.com>,   
   > Robert   
   > > > > > > > > B.   
   > > > > > > > > Winn  wrote:   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > William Klee  wrote in message   
   > > > > > > > > > news:<200220041359203001%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...   
   > > > > > > > > > > In article <7943568.0402200538.2c3bf7c9@post   
   ng.google.com>,   
   > >  Robert   
   > > > > > > > > > > B.   
   > > > > > > > > > > Winn  wrote:   
   > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So? You implied that *I* have done abortions.   
   > Talking   
   > >  about   
   > > > >  a   
   > > > >  woman   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > died in Phoenix is, like most of your posts, a   
   > >  non-sequitor.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your words from a dead European language are like   
   > most of   
   > >  your   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > words,   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > an attempt to pretend that you are feeble minded.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > Here on Earth, boobie, we use words to facilitate a   
   > process   
   > >  we   
   > >  like   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > to   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > call "communication". You might try it some time.   
   > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > The only thing you have communicated so far is that you   
   > are   
   > > > > > > > > > > > capable of   
   > > > > > > > > > > > pretending that you do not know what a child is.   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > You could actually try to *prove* that claim of yours, but   
   > we   
   > >  all   
   > > > > > > > > > > know   
   > > > > > > > > > > you won't, because you can't. And that's where you fail at   
   > this   
   > > > > > > > > > > whole   
   > > > > > > > > > > communication thing: you either can't or won't communicate.   
   > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > What is there to communicate?   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > We could start with this unstoppable urge of yours to lie.   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > You are a homicidal person who delights   
   > > > > > > > > > in the deaths of children.   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > Lies such as this one, for starters.   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > What do you suggest we talk about?   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > Your lies, and why you feel the need to keep making them.   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > I have not lied about anything.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > That's a lie, right there. You have accused me of posting things I   
   > > > > > > never posted, which is a lie, repeated numerous times.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > It really is wrong to kill children,   
   > > > > > > > as you already know.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > And I have never said that it *wasn't* wrong to kill children,   
   which   
   > > > > > > makes that last line of yours a lie by implication.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > Why *do* you lie so much, boobie? You know we catch them.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > What is this?   
   > > > >   
   > > > > What is what?   
   > > > >   
   > > > > > *do*   
   > > > >   
   > > > > This? do? Is that what you're wondering about? Look it up in the   
   > > > > dictionary.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > > The only thing you catch is your own spirit of   
   > > > > > homicide.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > *What* spirit of homocide?   
   > > > >   
   > > > > > It does not matter much what you say.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > It does on usenet.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > > Actions speak louder   
   > > > > > than words.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > And lying is an action. An action you are *quite* fond of. Why is that?   
   > > >   
   > > > So you accuse me of lying.   
   > >   
   > > Yes, I am, because you *are* a liar.   
   > >   
   > > > Generally speaking, a person who accuses   
   > > > needs to prove his accusation.   
   > >   
   > > Oh, the *irony* of this statement! When have *you* ever bothered bo   
   > > prove *your* accusations? Fortunately for *me*, proving you to be a   
   > > liar is quite easy.   
   > >   
   > > > What do you claim I lied about?   
   > >   
   > > How many do you want? You've claimed I kill children; that's a lie. You   
   > > claimed I said I couldn't tell what a child was; that's another lie. Do   
   > > you want more?   
   >   
   > Well, as you can see, I did not lie.   
      
   Well, as everyone can see, you do lie. Repeatedly.   
      
   > child  n.  1.  an unborn or  recently born person   
   >                                  Merriam-Webster dictionary   
      
   Non-sequitor. A partial dictionary definition proves nothing beyond   
   that you can copy text. Big whoop.   
      
   > A child is killed any time an abortion takes place for any reason.   
      
   You have yet to prove that abortions kill anyone. A fetus != a child.   
      
   > You spend all of your time in this newsgroup trying to promote   
   > abortion.   
      
   Another lie, boobie. I spend all my time in this newsgroup amusing   
   myself. It's just your disfortune to have become one of my amusements.   
      
   >       Secondly, I did not say you could not tell what a child is.  I   
      
   Learn to read, boobie. This is what *I* said in the post you   
   non-sequtored to: "You claimed I said I couldn't tell what a child is;   
   that's another lie." Note that I didn't say that you said I couldn't   
   tell the difference; I said that you said I said that.   
      
   > said that you pretend that you cannot tell what a child is.   
      
   And that's another lie. How many lies is enough for you?   
      
   > There is   
   > a difference.  What you do is  called dishonesty.   
      
   *That's* enough irony to cure pernicious anemia: *you* calling someone   
   else dishonest.   
      
   >     That takes care of what you have claimed I am lying about so far.   
      
   Takes care of it in the sense of not touching it at all.   
      
   > If you think that you have something more, go ahead with your   
   > accusations.   
      
   The ones I've made so far still stand, thus they are enough for now.   
      
   --   
   ...and in elder days there were wars in the Heavens between the Ibemmeraphim   
   and the Angels of the Apple of Knowledge...   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)