XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion, us.issues.abortion   
   From: askme@netins.net   
      
   "Robert B. Winn"  wrote in message   
   news:7943568.0402231946.4f127999@posting.google.com...   
   > "MrD Pstychologist \(retired\)"  wrote in message   
   news:...   
   > > "Robert B. Winn"  wrote in message   
   > > news:7943568.0402221655.773cb168@posting.google.com...   
   > > > "MrD Pstychologist \(retired\)"  wrote in message   
   > >  news:...   
   > > > > "Robert B. Winn"  wrote in message   
   > > > > news:7943568.0402211251.6c8ed650@posting.google.com...   
   > > > > > "MrD Pstychologist \(retired\)"  wrote in   
   message   
   > >  news:...   
   > > > > > > "Robert B. Winn"  wrote in message   
   > > > > > > news:7943568.0402200541.4584bc61@posting.google.com...   
   > > > > > > > "MrD Pstychologist \(retired\)"  wrote in   
   > >  message   
   > >  news:...   
   > > > > > > > > "Robert B. Winn"  wrote in message   
   > > > > > > > > news:7943568.0402191741.3d06597b@posting.google.com...   
   > > > > > > > > > sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in message   
   > >  news:...   
   > > > > > > > > > > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in   
   message   
   > >  news:<7943568.0402182117.5f86c542@posting.google.com>...   
   > > > > > > > > > > > sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in message   
   > >  news:...   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in   
   > >  message   
   > >  news:<7943568.0402170651.4687f77@posting.google.com>...   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in   
   message   
   > >  news:...   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote   
   in   
   > > > >  message   
   > > > >  news:<7943568.0402151201.24fec16d@posting.google.com>...   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Christopher A. Lee  wrote   
   in   
   > > > >  message   
   > > > >  news:...   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 15 Feb 2004 05:17:48 -0800,   
   > > > >  rbwinn47@mybluelight.com   
   > > > >  (Robert B.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Winn) wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> And when has the US defined the fetus as   
   a   
   > >  child?   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Children inside their mother's wombs were   
   > >  defined   
   > > > >  as   
   > > > >  children long   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >before the United States even existed.  For   
   > >  instance,   
   > > > > > >  in   
   > > > > > >  the King   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >James version of the Bible, we find the   
   > >  following   
   > >  scripture,  Luke 2:5   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To be taxed with Mary his espoused wife,   
   being   
   > >  great   
   > > > > > >  with   
   > > > > > >  child.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  As can be seen from this scripture,   
   Jesus   
   > >  Christ   
   > >  was   
   > > > > > >  a   
   > > > > > >  child while   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >he was inside his mother's womb, a fact   
   > >  recognized   
   > >  by   
   > > > > > >  the   
   > > > > > >  translators   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >as recently as 1611.  Whether all people   
   after   
   > >  that   
   > > > > > >  time   
   > > > > > >  pretended to   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >be feeble minded the way you are   
   pretending, I   
   > >  would   
   > > > > > >  have   
   > > > > > >  to take some   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >time to study.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here's a hint, moron: the bible is not part   
   of   
   > >  the   
   > >  law   
   > > > > > >  of   
   > > > > > >  the United   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > States.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Answer his question: WHEN HAS THE US DEFINED   
   THE   
   > >  FETUS   
   > > > > > >  AS A   
   > > > > > >  CHILD?   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Robert B. Winn   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, I don't know what you are claiming is   
   the   
   > >  law of   
   > > > >  the   
   > > > >  United   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > States.  It appears to me that you started   
   killing   
   > > > > > >  children   
   > > > > > >  and found   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > out that no one was hindering you, so you are   
   > >  claiming   
   > > > > > >  that   
   > > > > > >  killing   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > children is the law of the United States.   
   > >  However,   
   > >  before   
   > > > > > >  you   
   > > > > > >  started   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > killing children, it was understood by all   
   that   
   > >  children   
   > > > > > >  had   
   > > > > > >  the right   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to live.  That was the law of the land.  Sorry   
   to   
   > >  burst   
   > > > > > >  your   
   > > > > > >  bubble.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Robert b. winn   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nobody has been saying that killing children is   
   > >  legal.   
   > > > > > >  Where   
   > > > > > >  did you   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > get that delusion from?  People have not been   
   going   
   > > > >  around   
   > > > >  killing   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > children.  Nobody has been saying that children   
   do   
   > >  not   
   > >  have   
   > > > > > >  the   
   > > > > > >  right   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to live.  Killing children has never been legal   
   in   
   > >  the   
   > >  USA,   
   > > > > > >  to   
   > > > > > >  the   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > best of my knowledge.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry, but that entire post is either a heap of   
   > >  lies, or   
   > > > >  a   
   > > > >  serious   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > delusion.  I am not sure which.  It could easily   
   be   
   > >  both.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mark Sebree   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > Every time an abortion takes place for any reason,   
   a   
   > >  child   
   > >  dies.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > Wrong.  Abortion harms no children, much less kills   
   > >  them.  A   
   > > > > > >  child   
   > > > > > >  has   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > been born, and is defined as a human being between   
   birth   
   > >  and   
   > >  puberty.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >  That is what abortion is.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > Again, wrong.  A abortion is a medical procedure   
   that is   
   > >  designed to   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > correct an unwanted medical condition, namely an   
   > >  unwanted   
   > >  pregnancy.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >  Go pretend to be feeble minded to someone else.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > I leave that job to you.  You are the only one that   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)