XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism
XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion, us.issues.abortion
From: fnord2k@yahoo.com
In article <7943568.0402240701.2fb6bd28@posting.google.com>, Robert B.
Winn wrote:
> William Klee wrote in message
> news:<230220042136174654%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...
> > In article <7943568.0402230645.742c8dde@posting.google.com>, Robert B.
> > Winn wrote:
> >
> > > William Klee wrote in message
> > > news:<220220041521307944%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...
> > > > In article <7943568.0402221232.260aca84@posting.google.com>, Robert B.
> > > > Winn wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > William Klee wrote in message
> > > > > news:<220220040011157640%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...
> > > > > > In article <7943568.0402211919.45fb9939@posting.google.com>, Robert
> > > > > > B.
> > > > > > Winn wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > William Klee wrote in message
> > > > > > > news:<210220041442212958%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...
> > > > > > > > In article <7943568.0402210619.28784b1@posting.google.com>,
> Robert
> > > > > > > > B.
> > > > > > > > Winn wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > William Klee wrote in message
> > > > > > > > > news:<200220042222553213%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...
> > > > > > > > > > In article <7943568.0402201702.1d62a2d7@post
ng.google.com>,
> > Robert
> > > > > > > > > > B.
> > > > > > > > > > Winn wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > William Klee wrote in message
> > > > > > > > > > > news:<200220040023246492%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...
> > > > > > > > > > > > In article <7943568.0402191802.41d7ab57@
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What do you think of this scripture?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Luke 2:5 To be taxed with Mary his espoused
> > wife,
> > being
> > > > > > > > great
> > > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > child.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A: I think it says Mary was pregnant.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > B: It's not germane to life in the real world.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > C: It's a non-sequitor.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We speak English here in the United States. If
> you
> > do not
> > want to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > discuss something with me, why don't you just say
> so
> > > > instead
> > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > throwing out words from a dead European language?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Oops, I'm sorry, I didn't realize that you're not
> smart
> > > > enough
> > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > use a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > dictionary. It's the word "non-sequitor" that's
> throwing
> > you. It
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > means
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "does not follow", as in any comment of yours does
> not
> > > > follow
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > logic
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > of the post you're allegedly responding to.
> > Incedentally,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > non-sequitor
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > is not a word from a dead European langauge, it's
an
> > English
> > word
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > *comes* from an almost-dead European language.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > If you want to say does not follow, go ahead and say
> it.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Exactly what I've *been* doing. And the word I use to
> say
> > it is
> > > > > > > > > > > > "non-sequitor".
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Using Latin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > words only shows that you believe that Europeans are
> the
> > source
> > > > > > > > > > > > > of all
> > > > > > > > > > > > > knowledge.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > No, it means there's a perfectly good word that says
> exactly
> > what I
> > > > > > > > > > > > want to say. And that word is "non-sequitor".
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Europeans are really the worst people on earth to
> imitate.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Didn't know you were a European.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I knew you were.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > You knew I were, what? European? I was born in Kansas. I
> live in
> > > > > > > > > > Nebraska. If you look Kansas and/or Nebraska up in a
> dictionary
> > or
> > > > > > > > > > atlas, you'll find out where they are. Free clue: it isn't
> > Europe.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Europeans have a different political philosophy than we have
> here
> > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > the United States. Europeans believe that people exist to
> serve
> > > > > > > > > government. This nation was founded on the principle that
the
> > > > > > > > > government should serve the people. There are many Europeans
> > > > > > > > > here in
> > > > > > > > > the United States, also quite a number of Mexicans.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Non-sequitor.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Well, as a European orieinted person, your belief is obviously
> > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > the people should serve government.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > A non-sequitor and a lie in one tidy little package.
> > > > >
> > > > > The standard European answer for all things.
> > > >
> > > > The standard literate person's answer for all your posts. Why invent
> > > > new words when the words we've already got work so well?
> > >
> > > You mean that most people who use words are pro-abortion.
> >
> > If I'd have meant that, I'd have said that. I didn't say that, so you
> > lied. Again.
> >
> > > Well, let's
> > > see how well your words work when Jesus Christ returns to judge the
> > > world.
> >
> > Let's see how well your words work when Cthulhu returns to devour the
> > world.
>
> Cthulhu never was here.
Just like jesus.
--
...and in elder days there were wars in the Heavens between the Ibemmeraphim
and the Angels of the Apple of Knowledge...
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
