XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.politics.religion, alt.religion.christian, alt.support.abortion   
   XPost: talk.abortion, talk.atheism   
   From: ladyhawk_twonospam@hotmail.com   
      
   Warnock wrote:   
      
   > "Thomas P."  wrote in message   
   > news:fi4d30tggd9uttev0f8v5p8ck4qe2u3kt6@4ax.com...   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >>>****** Let's be fair, if there are two people and you have a split vote -   
   >>>how do you resolve it? There's no intrinsic reason why the woman should   
   >   
   > have   
   >   
   >>>the casting vote,   
   >>   
   >>Of course there is.  She is the one who is directly affected.   
   >   
   >   
   > ****** The husband is also very affected!   
   >   
   >   
   >>>nor the man. So we have to allow 'right action' to have   
   >>>the casting vote.   
   >>   
   >>There is no such person as "right action".   If the woman does not   
   >>agree with the man, she is the one who has the most at stake and   
   >>should be the one who decides.   
   >   
   >   
   > ****** That's a selfish attitude!   
      
   And the man demanding to be obeyed isn't?   
   It's her body at stake, so she's got an absolute right to be selfish.   
   Somehow I doubt that if your wife demanded you go for a penile removal   
   that you'd be as unselfish as you'd like women to be.   
      
   > --   
   > **** The fact that the greatest scientists, to their utter dismay, can't   
   > breath life into a dead body or create a perfect animal and breath life into   
   > it - is PROOF of a higher intelligence! ****   
   >   
   > Leviticus 20:13  If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman,   
   > both of them have committed an abomination: they shall   
   > surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.   
   >   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)