XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.politics.religion, alt.religion.christian, alt.support.abortion   
   XPost: talk.abortion, talk.atheism   
   From: ladyhawk_twonospam@hotmail.com   
      
   Warnock wrote:   
      
   > "--sexkitten--"  wrote in message   
   > news:c1goig$1hu50e$2@ID-163025.news.uni-berlin.de...   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >>>>>>****** Well we can always go back to my signature. There are 6 billion   
   >>>>>>people, somebody created them, somebody was not us - conclusion   
   >>>   
   >>>somebody has   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>>>>more knowledge than us!   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>That is not evidence, that is an assumption.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Warnock is terminally, mindless, clueless, dishonest, and revels in his   
   >>>>ignorance.  He's also selfish as hell and a terminal waste of space,   
   >>>>oxygen, and nutrients.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>****** On the contrary, I'm totally honest (to my viewpoint)   
   >>   
   >>Does your viewpoint include never answering a question?   
   >   
   >   
   > ****** I answer all reasonable questions, what did you have in mind?   
      
   How about this one?   
      
    > ****** Equal rights should mean that if she wants an abortion, we   
   both have   
    > an equal say.   
      
   And if she says yes and you say no, who gets the final say and please   
   explain to me how it is equal.   
      
   I asked this one a while back, too.   
      
   You know, Warnock, I notice large chunks of peoples posts are being   
   snipped by you, and a lot of questions are not being answered. I'd like   
   to know why you find it necessary to do this.   
      
   This one?   
      
    > ****** The evidence in favour of theism is overwelming, it's a sensible   
    > approach!   
      
   I have to single this statement out. Produce some evidence for me. Not   
   theory or opinion, evidence.   
      
   This one?   
      
    > ****** Let's just assume, for a couple of minutes, that abortion was   
    > illegal. Going full term would then be no worse than obeying any   
   other law -   
    > you steal, you go to prison etc. So, in fact, there is no slavery   
   involved.   
      
   When slavery was legal, was it OK?   
      
   And those are just a few of mine. I can repost other peoples, but it   
   would take a while.   
      
   >>  and most people   
   >>   
   >>>over 60 yrs. are 'oxygen and nutrient' thieves!   
   >>>In one's daily life, we have to make assumptions, from time to time.   
   >>>Assuming the human race was/is created, looks acceptable to me. Assuming   
   >>>that, as the human race is created, there must have been / is, a   
   >   
   > Creator!   
   >   
   > --   
   > **** The fact that the greatest scientists, to their utter dismay, can't   
   > breath life into a dead body or create a perfect animal and breath life into   
   > it - is PROOF of a higher intelligence! ****   
   >   
   > Leviticus 20:13  If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman,   
   > both of them have committed an abomination: they shall   
   > surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.   
   >   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)