XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion, us.issues.abortion   
   From: fnord2k@yahoo.com   
      
   In article <7943568.0402261743.1cad21e9@posting.google.com>, Robert B.   
   Winn  wrote:   
      
   > William Klee  wrote in message   
   > news:<260220040013238444%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...   
   > > In article <7943568.0402241953.54a393e@posting.google.com>, Robert B.   
   > > Winn  wrote:   
   > >   
   > > > William Klee  wrote in message   
   > > > news:<220220040013104556%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...   
   > > > > In article <7943568.0402211328.3a650bc5@posting.google.com>, Robert B.   
   > > > > Winn  wrote:   
   > > > >   
   > > > > > William Klee  wrote in message   
   > > > > > news:<200220042219582609%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...   
   > > > > > > In article <7943568.0402201626.52494be@posting.google.com>, Robert   
   > > > > > > B.   
   > > > > > > Winn  wrote:   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > William Klee  wrote in message   
   > > > > > > > news:<200220041401431581%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...   
   > > > > > > > > In article <7943568.0402200550.ee7ca86@posting.google.com>,   
   > Robert   
   > > > > > > > > B.   
   > > > > > > > > Winn  wrote:   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in message   
   > > > > > > > > > news:...   
   > > > > > > > > > > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in message   
   > > > > > > > > > > news:<7943568.0402171639.325a07c6@posting.google.com>...   
   > > > > > > > > > > > sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in message   
   > > > > > > > > > > > news:...   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in   
   > message   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > news:<7943568.0402150533.246ff8c8@postin   
   .google.com>...   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in message   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > news:...   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in   
   > >  message   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > news:<7943568.0402131727.1a9e4b1e@posting.google.com>...   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > William Klee  wrote in message   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > news:<130220041336300785%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In article   
   > >  ,   
   > >  Attila   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 09:54:27 -0600, "Mark K.   
   > >  Bilbo"   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  in alt.abortion with   
   > >  message-id   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   >    
   > >  wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >And so upon Fri, 13 Feb 2004 04:13:13 -0600   
   > didst   
   > > > >  William   
   > > > >  Klee speak   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >thusly:   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> In article   
   > >  <7943568.0402121806.1ea4e0e5@posting.google.com>, Robert B.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Winn  wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Well, I am not sure what he wrote in, but   
   > he   
   > >  was   
   > > > >  aware   
   > > > >  that there   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> would be other languages besides the one   
   > he   
   > >  used.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> You also claim that even though he didn't   
   > write   
   > >  what   
   > > > > > >  you   
   > > > > > >  claim he   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> wrote, he *meant* what you claim he wrote   
   > >  because   
   > >  he   
   > > > > > >  knew   
   > > > > > >  you'd be   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> reading it in English someday. That's   
   > funny,   
   > >  in a   
   > > > > > >  pathetic   
   > > > > > >  sort of way.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >What's even funnier is Boobert admitting he   
   > >  really   
   > > > > > >  doesn't   
   > > > > > >  understand   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >this thing about the bible being written in   
   > other   
   > >  languages.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >I'd bet money he really does *not understand   
   > >  that...   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > He probably can't understand other languages.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I wouldn't claim he can understand English.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, let's concentrate on one English word.    
   What   
   > >  does   
   > > > >  the   
   > > > >  word   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > child mean?   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Robert b. winn   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A person between birth an puberty.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Someone who is acting childish (You, for example).   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mark Sebree   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > So what do you think the word child means in this   
   > >  scripture?   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > Luke 2:5  To be taxed  with Mary his espoused wife,   
   > being   
   > >  great   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > with   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > child.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > That Mary was pregnant.  That is what the idiom "with   
   > child"   
   > >  means,   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > and that is what the latin says.  Your opinion on the   
   > matter   
   > >  has no   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > bearing on reality.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > By the way, we already know that the KJV is a poor   
   > >  translation.   
   > >  You   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > don't have to keep tellinf us this.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jesus Christ seems to have been a child while he was   
   > in   
   > >  his   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > mother's   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > womb.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > Robert B. winn   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > Only in your fevered imagination.  In reality, assuming   
   > that   
   > >  Jesus   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > actually existed, at the time, he was a fetus.  He did   
   > not   
   > >  become a   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > child until his birth.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > Let us know when you will be joining us in the real   
   > world.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > Mark Sebree   
   > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > Good thing we have the Bible to tell us what a child is,   
   > >  right?   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > Who cares what the Bible says?  We live in a secular world.   
   > You   
   > > > > > > > > > > could   
   > > > > > > > > > > also be saying "Good thing that the Sutras tell us what a   
   > child   
   > > > > > > > > > > is."   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)