XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.politics.religion, alt.religion.christian, alt.support.abortion   
   XPost: talk.abortion, talk.atheism   
   From: warnnock@pop.co.za   
      
   "Thomas P."  wrote in message   
   news:4vko30tmajlqqc5mb399eg8lfsuloc0bhh@4ax.com...   
      
      
   > >> >****** Let's be fair, if there are two people and you have a split   
   vote -   
   > >> >how do you resolve it? There's no intrinsic reason why the woman   
   should   
   > >have   
   > >> >the casting vote,   
   > >>   
   > >> Of course there is.  She is the one who is directly affected.   
   > >   
   > >****** The husband is also very affected!   
   >   
   > Please try to be a little honest.  It is quite clear that the pregnant   
   > woman is the one who is directly affected.  She has quite a bit more   
   > at stake than the man does.  It is her body not his.  It is her   
   > decision not his.   
      
   ****** It is half his foetus, she is carrying. He is most likely giving her   
   moral, financial and TLC support! He is at least as immotionally upset as   
   she is, if an abortion happens. Go full term - it's the right thing to do!   
      
   --   
   **** The fact that the greatest scientists, to their utter dismay, can't   
   breath life into a dead body or create a perfect animal and breath life into   
   it - is PROOF of a higher intelligence! ****   
      
   Leviticus 20:13  If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman,   
   both of them have committed an abomination: they shall   
   surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)