XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.politics.religion, alt.religion.christian, alt.support.abortion   
   XPost: talk.abortion, talk.atheism   
      
   "Warnock"  wrote in   
   news:c1o987$ntp$2@ctb-nnrp2.saix.net:   
      
   >   
   > "--sexkitten--"  wrote in message   
   > news:c1j6ov$1ik2v0$1@ID-163025.news.uni-berlin.de...   
   >   
   >   
   >> How about this one?   
   >>    
   >>  > ****** Equal rights should mean that if she wants an abortion, we   
   >> both have   
   >>  > an equal say.   
   >>   
   >> And if she says yes and you say no, who gets the final say and please   
   >> explain to me how it is equal.   
   >   
   > ****** Well, if she always has the casting vote, then there is no   
   > equality! If there is a dead-lock, right action needs to prevail!   
   >   
   Too bad.  Her body, her choice.  Whether you think it is fair and equitable   
   or not, the pregnant woman has the final say, period.  If you don't like   
   it, come back as a woman in your next life and you can make your own   
   reproductive choices.   
      
      
   >> I asked this one a while back, too.   
   >>    
   >> You know, Warnock, I notice large chunks of peoples posts are being   
   >> snipped by you, and a lot of questions are not being answered. I'd   
   >> like to know why you find it necessary to do this.   
   >   
   > I snip all old paragraphs that do not concern what I'm replying to -   
   > the is reasonable courtesy.   
   >   
   >> This one?   
   >>    
   >>  > ****** The evidence in favour of theism is overwelming, it's a   
   >>  > sensible approach!   
   >>   
   >> I have to single this statement out. Produce some evidence for me.   
   >> Not theory or opinion, evidence.   
   >   
   > ****** From logic, it is reasonable to assume that if life was   
   > created, there must have been a creator! At the very least there is a   
   > 50% chance that theism is correct! Lastly, you can't peoduce any   
   > evidence to the contrary!   
   >   
   The lack of your evidence *is* our evidence.   
      
   >> This one?   
   >>    
   >>  > ****** Let's just assume, for a couple of minutes, that abortion   
   >>  > was illegal. Going full term would then be no worse than obeying   
   >>  > any   
   >> other law -   
   >>  > you steal, you go to prison etc. So, in fact, there is no slavery   
   >> involved.   
   >>   
   >> When slavery was legal, was it OK?   
   >   
   > ****** We were not discussing whether slavery was "OK", that's another   
   > issue. We were discussing whether we can call pregnancy a form of   
   > slavery!!   
   >   
   >   
   Call it what you will.  It doesn't matter.  Abortion-choice is the law of   
   the land in America and it is here to stay.  There is no way it can ever go   
   back to being any other way.  Her body, her choice.  Learn to live with it.   
      
      
   >> And those are just a few of mine. I can repost other peoples, but it   
   >> would take a while.   
   >   
   > ****** All answered above.   
   >   
   > --   
   > **** The fact that the greatest scientists, to their utter dismay,   
   > can't breath life into a dead body or create a perfect animal and   
   > breath life into it - is PROOF of a higher intelligence! ****   
   >   
   > Leviticus 20:13  If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a   
   > woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall   
   > surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.   
   >   
   >   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)