XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism
XPost: alt.politics.religion, alt.religion.christian, alt.support.abortion
XPost: talk.abortion, talk.atheism
From: ladyhawk_twonospam@hotmail.com
Warnock wrote:
> "--sexkitten--" wrote in message
> news:c1j6ov$1ik2v0$1@ID-163025.news.uni-berlin.de...
>
>
>
>>How about this one?
>>
>> > ****** Equal rights should mean that if she wants an abortion, we
>>both have
>> > an equal say.
>>
>>And if she says yes and you say no, who gets the final say and please
>>explain to me how it is equal.
>
>
> ****** Well, if she always has the casting vote, then there is no equality!
> If there is a dead-lock, right action needs to prevail!
And the right action would be following her vote, right?
You keep trying to get around actually saying that she should do as
she's told, don't you?
>
>
>>I asked this one a while back, too.
>>
>>You know, Warnock, I notice large chunks of peoples posts are being
>>snipped by you, and a lot of questions are not being answered. I'd like
>>to know why you find it necessary to do this.
>
>
> I snip all old paragraphs that do not concern what I'm replying to - the is
> reasonable courtesy.
You snip a lot of new paragraphs with relevant points too, and that was
the ones I was asking about. Snipping old pieces I can understand.
>
>>This one?
>>
>> > ****** The evidence in favour of theism is overwelming, it's a sensible
>> > approach!
>>
>>I have to single this statement out. Produce some evidence for me. Not
>>theory or opinion, evidence.
>
>
> ****** From logic, it is reasonable to assume that if life was created,
This is the part that requires proof.
> there must have been a creator! At the very least there is a 50% chance that
> theism is correct! Lastly, you can't peoduce any evidence to the contrary!
The catholic sex scandals, the muslim terrorists, the Palestinian
christians blowing people up, the jewish government mowing them down to
retaliate, the vast amount of money in the church coffers and the vaster
amount of starving people in the world (but they have such pretty
churches!), christian and muslim doctrine of overpopulation and the high
death rate for childbirth and children worldwide, can I stop now? I'm
getting carpal tunnel here.
>
>>This one?
>>
>> > ****** Let's just assume, for a couple of minutes, that abortion was
>> > illegal. Going full term would then be no worse than obeying any
>>other law -
>> > you steal, you go to prison etc. So, in fact, there is no slavery
>>involved.
>>
>>When slavery was legal, was it OK?
>
>
> ****** We were not discussing whether slavery was "OK", that's another
> issue. We were discussing whether we can call pregnancy a form of slavery!!
And your statement was that since it would be the law, it would not be
slavery. So when slavery was the law, was it OK? It's a valid question.
>
>>And those are just a few of mine. I can repost other peoples, but it
>>would take a while.
>
>
> ****** All answered above.
Not even remotely.
> --
> **** The fact that the greatest scientists, to their utter dismay, can't
> breath life into a dead body or create a perfect animal and breath life into
> it - is PROOF of a higher intelligence! ****
>
> Leviticus 20:13 If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman,
> both of them have committed an abomination: they shall
> surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.
>
>
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
