XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion, us.issues.abortion   
   From: dbarnes111@yahoo.com   
      
   In article <7943568.0402271951.63f018f9@posting.google.com>, Robert B.   
   Winn  wrote:   
      
   > sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in message   
   > news:...   
   > > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in message   
   > > news:<7943568.0402230613.49709728@posting.google.com>...   
   > > > sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in message   
   > > > news:...   
   > > > > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in message   
   > > > > news:<7943568.0402221535.6d5c7b41@posting.google.com>...   
   > > > > > sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in message   
   > > > > > news:...   
   > > > > > > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in message   
   > > > > > > news:<7943568.0402211942.36af7549@posting.google.com>...   
   > > > > > > > sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in message   
   > > > > > > > news:...   
   > > > > > > > > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in message   
   > news:<7943568.0402210631.24f34faf@posting.google.com>...   
   > > > > > > > > > sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in message   
   > news:...   
   > > > > > > > > > > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in message   
   > news:<7943568.0402201707.5e7597@posting.google.com>...   
   > > > > > > > > > > > sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in message   
   > news:...   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn)   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, we already knew that you had no interest in   
   > the facts.  I am   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > just highlighting how weak and pathetic your   
   > arguments are, as will as   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > showing that you continue to run away from   
   > objective challenges to   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > your absurd statements.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  Go pretend that you are feeble minded to someone   
   > else.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Robert B. Womm   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry, you are the only one that is feeble minded   
   > here.  If you cannot   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > handle an intelligent and educated debator that you   
   > cannot browbeat or   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bullshit, stay out of the deep end of the debating   
   > pool.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Again, you run away.  You have consistantly refused   
   > to back up your   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > own assertions with anything other than your   
   > personal opinion.  And   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you seem to think that your religion counts for   
   > something in this type   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of debate.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As long as you make oppressive and ridiculous   
   > assertions, and demand   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that women be enslaved and tortured simply because   
   > they are pregnant   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and do not wish to be, I can and will counter you,   
   > and show your   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > arguments to have no substance.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You can ignore me, but you cannot dismiss me.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mark Sebree   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sure I can.  You are dismissed because you are an   
   > adulterer.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > Robert B. Winn   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > You have never objectively shown me to be an adulterer.   
   > And religious   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > and personal beliefs of the matter have no place in   
   > this discussion,   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > since the topic is secular.  After all, why should I   
   > care what   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > superstitious nonsense you belief in?   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > It is just another of your ad hominem attacks.  What's   
   > more, you are   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > running away again.  I asked you for specific   
   > information in my post   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > that you stated that you had, and you did not answer.   
   > All you are   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > doing is calling me names because you cannot handle an   
   > intelligent,   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > educated, and knowledgable debator.  When you are   
   > confronted by   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > someone that you cannot browbeat or bullshit, you run   
   > away.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > All you are doing is showing how weak you postion   
   > actually is.  And   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > you are showing everyone how spineless you are.  You   
   > call people names   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > and then run away, like a schoolyard bully when people   
   > finally stand   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > up to him.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > If you don't want to debate, don't jump into the deep   
   > end of Usenet.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > You will be eaten alive.  As you well know, given the   
   > number of times   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > it has happened to you.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > Mark Sebree   
   > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > I said you were an adulterer.   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > Yes, you did.   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > >  I do not need to back that up with   
   > > > > > > > > > > > anything, do I?   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > Yes, you do.  You make such an accusation, you need to   
   > support it.   
   > > > > > > > > > > All that is so far is an unsupported accusation, one that   
   > many people   
   > > > > > > > > > > would consider slanderous, or more properly since this is   
   > effectively   
   > > > > > > > > > > a print forum, libelous.   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > >  You have all of the information you need to know   
   > > > > > > > > > > > whether I told the truth when I said that or not.   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > Yes, and you have lied about it.  I am not an adulterer.   
   > And you have   
   > > > > > > > > > > failed to show that I am.   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > >  You people are   
   > > > > > > > > > > > about as deep as a septic tank.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > Robert B. winn   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > Well, that beats you.  You have no depth at all.  Although   
   > your   
   > > > > > > > > > > debating style does stink far worse than any septic tank   
   > ever could.   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > Mark Sebree   
   > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > I am not debating.   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > Everyone already knows that.  You are incapable of debating, it   
   > seems.   
   > > > > > > > >  All you do is dictate, and recite ad hominems and non   
   > sequitors.   
   > > > > > > > >   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)