XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion, us.issues.abortion   
   From: askme@netins.net   
      
   "Robert B. Winn"  wrote in message   
   news:7943568.0402281858.2823089d@posting.google.com...   
   > David Barnes  wrote in message   
   news:<270220042004522820%dbarnes111@yahoo.com>...   
   > > In article <7943568.0402271951.63f018f9@posting.google.com>, Robert B.   
   > > Winn  wrote:   
   > >   
   > > > sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in message   
   > > > news:...   
   > > > > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in message   
   > > > > news:<7943568.0402230613.49709728@posting.google.com>...   
   > > > > > sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in message   
   > > > > > news:...   
   > > > > > > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in message   
   > > > > > > news:<7943568.0402221535.6d5c7b41@posting.google.com>...   
   > > > > > > > sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in message   
   > > > > > > > news:...   
   > > > > > > > > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in message   
   > > > > > > > > news:<7943568.0402211942.36af7549@posting.google.com>...   
   > > > > > > > > > sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in message   
   > > > > > > > > > news:...   
   > > > > > > > > > > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in   
   message   
   > >  news:<7943568.0402210631.24f34faf@posting.google.com>...   
   > > > > > > > > > > > sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in message   
   > >  news:...   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in   
   message   
   > >  news:<7943568.0402201707.5e7597@posting.google.com>...   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in   
   message   
   > >  news:...   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn)   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, we already knew that you had no   
   interest in   
   > >  the facts.  I am   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > just highlighting how weak and pathetic your   
   > >  arguments are, as will as   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > showing that you continue to run away from   
   > >  objective challenges to   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > your absurd statements.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  Go pretend that you are feeble minded to   
   someone   
   > >  else.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Robert B. Womm   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry, you are the only one that is feeble   
   minded   
   > >  here.  If you cannot   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > handle an intelligent and educated debator   
   that you   
   > >  cannot browbeat or   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bullshit, stay out of the deep end of the   
   debating   
   > >  pool.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Again, you run away.  You have consistantly   
   refused   
   > >  to back up your   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > own assertions with anything other than your   
   > >  personal opinion.  And   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you seem to think that your religion counts   
   for   
   > >  something in this type   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of debate.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As long as you make oppressive and   
   ridiculous   
   > >  assertions, and demand   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that women be enslaved and tortured simply   
   because   
   > >  they are pregnant   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and do not wish to be, I can and will   
   counter you,   
   > >  and show your   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > arguments to have no substance.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You can ignore me, but you cannot dismiss   
   me.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mark Sebree   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sure I can.  You are dismissed because you are   
   an   
   > >  adulterer.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Robert B. Winn   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You have never objectively shown me to be an   
   adulterer.   
   > >  And religious   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and personal beliefs of the matter have no place   
   in   
   > >  this discussion,   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > since the topic is secular.  After all, why   
   should I   
   > >  care what   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > superstitious nonsense you belief in?   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is just another of your ad hominem attacks.   
   What's   
   > >  more, you are   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > running away again.  I asked you for specific   
   > >  information in my post   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that you stated that you had, and you did not   
   answer.   
   > >  All you are   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > doing is calling me names because you cannot   
   handle an   
   > >  intelligent,   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > educated, and knowledgable debator.  When you   
   are   
   > >  confronted by   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone that you cannot browbeat or bullshit,   
   you run   
   > >  away.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All you are doing is showing how weak you   
   postion   
   > >  actually is.  And   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you are showing everyone how spineless you are.   
   You   
   > >  call people names   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and then run away, like a schoolyard bully when   
   people   
   > >  finally stand   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > up to him.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you don't want to debate, don't jump into the   
   deep   
   > >  end of Usenet.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You will be eaten alive.  As you well know,   
   given the   
   > >  number of times   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it has happened to you.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mark Sebree   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > I said you were an adulterer.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, you did.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >  I do not need to back that up with   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > anything, do I?   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, you do.  You make such an accusation, you need   
   to   
   > >  support it.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > All that is so far is an unsupported accusation, one   
   that   
   > >  many people   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > would consider slanderous, or more properly since   
   this is   
   > >  effectively   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > a print forum, libelous.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >  You have all of the information you need to know   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > whether I told the truth when I said that or not.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, and you have lied about it.  I am not an   
   adulterer.   
   > >  And you have   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)