XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian, alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion   
   XPost: us.issues.abortion   
   From: fnord2k@yahoo.com   
      
   In article <7943568.0402291643.6f65bca4@posting.google.com>, Robert B.   
   Winn  wrote:   
      
   > William Klee  wrote in message   
   > news:<290220041328190671%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...   
   > > In article <7943568.0402290229.3bd0558@posting.google.com>, Robert B.   
   > > Winn  wrote:   
   > >   
   > > > William Klee  wrote in message   
   > > > news:<270220042359048631%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...   
   > > > > In article <7943568.0402271938.35d935cf@posting.google.com>, Robert B.   
   > > > > Winn  wrote:   
   > > > >   
   > > > > > telige@mail.clara.fl.com (William) wrote in message   
   > > > > > news:<403fd63b.13833633@news-text.blueyonder.co.uk>...   
   > > > > > > On 27 Feb 2004 04:38:18 -0800, rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B.   
   > > > > > > Winn) wrote:   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > >Ex 3:14  And God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM: and he said,   
   Thou   
   > > > > > > >shalt say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you.   
   > > > > > > >15  And God said moreover unto Moses, Thou shalt say unto the   
   > > > > > > >children   
   > > > > > > >of Israel, The Lord God of your fathers, theeGod of Abraham, the   
   > > > > > > >God   
   > > > > > > >of Isaac, the God of Jacob , hath sent me unto you:  this is my   
   > > > > > > >name   
   > > > > > > >forever, and this is my memorial unto all generations.   
   > > > > > > >Robert B. Winn   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > Which, of course, is completely irrelevant.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > William   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > Why would you consider it irrelevant?   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Because it's a non-sequitor.   
   > > >   
   > > > No, it is not.   
   > >   
   > > A non-sequitor remains a non-sequitor no matter how hard you stomp your   
   > > feet and insist "is too is too is too!" (Where I'm from, we call that a   
   > > tantrum and consider it a sign of childishness.)   
   > >   
   > > > I was just trying to get you to use your Latin.   
   > >   
   > > It's English that comes from Latin.   
   > >   
   > > > Now   
   > > > that you have shown that you are proficient in that language, don't   
   > >   
   > > What level of expertise do you consider "proficient"?   
   > >   
   > > > you think you should consider becoming a Catholic priest?   
   > >   
   > > Nope. I don't believe in pedophilia.   
   > >   
   > > > It is not a   
   > > > difficult job, and you already seem to have all the qualifications.   
   > >   
   > > A: I'm an atheist, which knocks any kind of priesthood out of   
   > > consideration.   
   > >   
   > > B: No matter how much you lie about it, I don't believe in pedophilia,   
   > > so even if I did feel like adopting the parasitic lifestyle of   
   > > religion, catholicism is right out.   
   >   
   > Well, if you are going to imitate a certain kind of person, it seems   
   > to me that you should consider being the real thing.   
      
   I'll consider that if I ever decide to imitate someone. Why don't you   
   consider imitating someone who doesn't lie and evade with every breath?   
      
   --   
   ...and in elder days there were wars in the Heavens between the Ibemmeraphim   
   and the Angels of the Apple of Knowledge...   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)