XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion, us.issues.abortion   
   From: fnord2k@yahoo.com   
      
   In article <7943568.0402291311.2565f84d@posting.google.com>, Robert B.   
   Winn  wrote:   
      
   > sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in message   
   > news:...   
   > > Bob  wrote in message news:...   
   > > > sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in   
   > > > news:c30d43e8.0402262325.76e090df@posting.google.com:   
   > > >   
   > > > > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in message   
   > > > > news:<7943568.0402261929.3c395d4c@posting.google.com>...   
   > > > >> sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in message   
   > > > >> news:...   
   > > > >> > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in message   
   > > > >> > news:<7943568.0402260057.3f7e1f67@posting.google.com>...   
   > > > >> > > sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in message   
   > > > >> > > news:...   
   > > > >> > > > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (   
   > > > >> > > > > > Mark Sebree   
   > > > >> > > > >   
   > > > >> > > > > The nice thing about my posts, though, is that they were   
   > > > >> > > > > posted by a person who has never been involved in killing   
   > > > >> > > > > children. Robert B. Winn   
   > > > >> > > >   
   > > > >> > > > The exact same thing can be said about my posts.  What's more,   
   > > > >> > > > I tell the truth in my posts, where as you tell blatent lies in   
   > > > >> > > > most of yours.  And for some reason, you cannot handle the   
   > > > >> > > > truth.   
   > > > >> > > >   
   > > > >> > > > Mark Sebree   
   > > > >> > >   
   > > > >> > > I can handle being classified as a parasitic organism.   
   > > > >> > > Robert B. Winn   
   > > > >> >   
   > > > >> > However, you cannot be classified as a parasitic organism.  No   
   > > > >> > person can.  However, embryos and fetuses can be, since they do fit   
   > > > >> > almost all requirements for being a parasite.  And since they have   
   > > > >> > not been born, they cannot be classified as persons anyway.   
   > > > >> >   
   > > > >> > You can be classified as a liar, a bully, and an idiot though.  You   
   > > > >> > do meet those requirements easily.   
   > > > >> >   
   > > > >> > Mark Sebree   
   > > > >>   
   > > > >> If I started out as a parasitic organism, that is what I still am.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Then how are you able to post on the Usenet?  Human beings are not   
   > > > > parasitic organisms, and no other creature on earth has the   
   > > > > intelligence to do so.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > If you are a parasitic organism, then you must be physically attached   
   > > > > to a host, and feeding on that host.  Whom is your host?  Your mother?   
   > > > >  Is she still providing all the bodily functions necessary for you to   
   > > > > live, incuding breathing for you, eliminating your wastes through her   
   > > > > bowels, digesting food and tranferring the constituent nutrients to   
   > > > > you?   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Quite frankly, you are either lying, or you are not aware of what a   
   > > > > parasitic organism actually is.   
   > > >   
   > > > You forgot about a third (and more likely) possibility.  He's nuts.   
   > > >   
   > >   
   > > No, I am not.  However, by my not bringing up the possibility   
   > > (likelihood) that he is nuts, and by giving him as much rope as he   
   > > wants to hang himsilf with, I let everyone else draw that conclusion   
   > > on their own.  And I cannot be accused of calling him insane, since I   
   > > never did so.   
   > >   
   > > Like I have said before, he is his own worst enemy.   
   > >   
   > > Mark Sebree   
   > >   
   > > > > Both at once are also possible.  And   
   > > > > likely, in your case.   
   > > > >   
   > >   
   > > > ><  I   
   > > > >> am the same person I was before I was born.   
   > > > >> Robert b. Winn   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Sorry, scientifically and factually false.  Before you were born, you   
   > > > > were not an indepedent being.  You were dependent on a host organism   
   > > > > to provide you with nutrients via digestion, oxygen, and waste   
   > > > > removal.  After your birth, you handled those functions yourself.   
   > > > > What's more, for most of the time that you were a embryo/fetus, you   
   > > > > did not have a working brain, nor the neural connections needed to   
   > > > > control the body.  After your birth, you did.  However, you do not   
   > > > > seem to use your higher intellectual functions much, judging by your   
   > > > > posts.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > What's more, people change as they experience life.  The people that   
   > > > > they know, the places that they have seen, the books that they read,   
   > > > > and every thing else that happens helps shape that person and change   
   > > > > them.  And for most people, this changing continues throughout their   
   > > > > lives.  It is much quicker in the young than in the old, but it does   
   > > > > continue.  Therefore, you are not even the same person you were 5   
   > > > > years ago.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Mark Sebree   
   > > > >   
   >   
   > I am the same person I always was.   
      
   You were always nuts? Or did you have an unpleasant experience in Viet   
   Nam? Kill too many babies over there, maybe?   
      
   --   
   ...and in elder days there were wars in the Heavens between the Ibemmeraphim   
   and the Angels of the Apple of Knowledge...   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)