XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion, us.issues.abortion   
   From: fnord2k@yahoo.com   
      
   In article , Mark   
   Sebree  wrote:   
      
   > "B. Kildow"  wrote in message   
   > news:<40421F94.3080204@spamenot.foxinternet.net>...   
   > > William Klee wrote:   
   > > > In article <7943568.0402230645.742c8dde@posting.google.com>, Robert B.   
   > > > Winn  wrote:   
   > > >   
   > > >   
   > > >>William Klee  wrote in message   
   > > >>news:<220220041521307944%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...   
   > > >>   
   > > >>>In article <7943568.0402221232.260aca84@posting.google.com>, Robert B.   
   > > >>>Winn  wrote:   
   > > >>>   
   > > >>>   
   > > >>>>William Klee  wrote in message   
   > > >>>>news:<220220040011157640%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...   
   > > >>>>   
   > > >>>>>In article <7943568.0402211919.45fb9939@posting.google.com>, Robert B.   
   > > >>>>>Winn  wrote:   
   > > >>>>>   
   > > >>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>William Klee  wrote in message   
   > > >>>>>>news:<210220041442212958%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...   
   > > >>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>In article <7943568.0402210619.28784b1@posting.google.com>, Robert   
   > > >>>>>>>B.   
   > > >>>>>>>Winn  wrote:   
   > > >>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>William Klee  wrote in message   
   > > >>>>>>>>news:<200220042222553213%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...   
   > > >>>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>>In article <7943568.0402201702.1d62a2d7@posting.google.com>,   
   > > >>>>>>>>   
   > > >>Robert   
   > > >>   
   > > >>>>>>>>>B.   
   > > >>>>>>>>>Winn  wrote:   
   > > >>>>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>William Klee  wrote in message   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>news:<200220040023246492%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>In article <7943568.0402191802.41d7ab57@   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>What do you think of this scripture?   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Luke 2:5  To be taxed with Mary his espoused   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > >>wife,   
   > > >>   
   > > >>> being   
   > > >>>   
   > > >>>>>>> great   
   > > >>>>>>> with   
   > > >>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>child.   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>A: I think it says Mary was pregnant.   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>B: It's not germane to life in the real world.   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>C: It's a non-sequitor.   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>We speak English here in the United States.  If you   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > >>do not   
   > > >>   
   > > >>> want to   
   > > >>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>discuss something with me, why don't you just say so   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > >>> instead   
   > > >>> of   
   > > >>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>throwing out words from a dead European language?   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>Oops, I'm sorry, I didn't realize that you're not smart   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > >>> enough   
   > > >>> to   
   > > >>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>use a   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>dictionary. It's the word "non-sequitor" that's throwing   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > >>> you. It   
   > > >>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>means   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>"does not follow", as in any comment of yours does not   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > >>> follow   
   > > >>> the   
   > > >>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>logic   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>of the post you're allegedly responding to.   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > >>Incedentally,   
   > > >>   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>non-sequitor   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>is not a word from a dead European langauge, it's an   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > >>English   
   > > >>   
   > > >>> word   
   > > >>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>that   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>*comes* from an almost-dead European language.   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>If you want to say does not follow, go ahead and say it.   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>Exactly what I've *been* doing. And the word I use to say   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > > >>it is   
   > > >>   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>"non-sequitor".   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>Using Latin   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>words only shows that you believe that Europeans are the   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > >>> source   
   > > >>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>of all   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>knowledge.   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>No, it means there's a perfectly good word that says exactly   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > > >>> what I   
   > > >>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>want to say. And that word is "non-sequitor".   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>>Europeans are really the worst people on earth to imitate.   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>>Didn't know you were a European.   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>>>I knew you were.   
   > > >>>>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>>>You knew I were, what? European? I was born in Kansas. I live in   
   > > >>>>>>>>>Nebraska. If you look Kansas and/or Nebraska up in a dictionary   
   > > >>>>>>>>   
   > > >>or   
   > > >>   
   > > >>>>>>>>>atlas, you'll find out where they are. Free clue: it isn't   
   > > >>>>>>>>   
   > > >>Europe.   
   > > >>   
   > > >>>>>>>>Europeans have a different political philosophy than we have here   
   > > >>>>>>>>in   
   > > >>>>>>>>the United States.  Europeans believe that people exist to serve   
   > > >>>>>>>>government.  This nation was founded on the principle that the   
   > > >>>>>>>>government should serve the people.  There are many Europeans   
   > > >>>>>>>>here in   
   > > >>>>>>>>the United States, also quite a number of Mexicans.   
   > > >>>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>>Non-sequitor.   
   > > >>>>>>   
   > > >>>>>>Well, as a European orieinted person, your belief is obviously that   
   > > >>>>>>the people should serve government.   
   > > >>>>>   
   > > >>>>>A non-sequitor and a lie in one tidy little package.   
   > > >>>>   
   > > >>>>The standard European answer for all things.   
   > > >>>   
   > > >>>The standard literate person's answer for all your posts. Why invent   
   > > >>>new words when the words we've already got work so well?   
   > > >>   
   > > >>You mean that most people who use words are pro-abortion.   
   > > >   
   > > >   
   > > > If I'd have meant that, I'd have said that. I didn't say that, so you   
   > > > lied. Again.   
   > > >   
   > > >   
   > > >>Well, let's   
   > > >>see how well your words work when Jesus Christ returns to judge the   
   > > >>world.   
   > > >   
   > > >   
   > > > Let's see how well your words work when Cthulhu returns to devour the   
   > > > world.   
   > > >   
   > >   
   > > I think I'd consider feeding Cthulhu an empty head to be animal abuse.   
   > >   
   > > BK   
   > > AA#1992   
   >   
   > Actaully, that would be more of an abuse to a deity.  Cthulhu is one   
   > of the Elder Gods, after all.  And most deities dislike sacrifices   
   > that are not up to snuff.   
      
   Apparently, all sacrifices to the Great Old Ones go insane. I don't   
   know if this is a side effect, or the main event. In the event it's the   
   latter, Cthulhu won't want boobie: he's damaged goods, since he's   
   already insane.   
      
   --   
   ...and in elder days there were wars in the Heavens between the Ibemmeraphim   
   and the Angels of the Apple of Knowledge...   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)