XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion, us.issues.abortion   
   From: junegill@btinternet.com   
      
   "B. Kildow"  wrote in message   
   news:40421F1E.2040201@spamenot.foxinternet.net...   
   > junegill wrote:   
   > > "Mark Sebree"  wrote in message   
   > > news:c30d43e8.0402272324.32d87945@posting.google.com...   
   > >   
   > >>"junegill"  wrote in message   
   > >   
   > > news:...   
   > >   
   > >>>"Robert B. Winn"  wrote in message   
   > >>>news:7943568.0402270823.29cdaf2c@posting.google.com...   
   > >>>   
   > >>>[snip]   
   > >>>   
   > >>>   
   > >>>>I don't treat women with any disrespect.  You adulterers are the ones   
   > >>>>who think they are chattel.   
   > >>>>Robert B. Winn   
   > >>>   
   > >>>Yes, you do - you've treated me with disrespect in your refusal to   
   > >>   
   > > debate   
   > >   
   > >>>with a woman, and in not answering the perfectly civil questions I've   
   > >>   
   > > asked   
   > >   
   > >>>you.   
   > >>   
   > >>Robert's probably response, even if he would not admit it.   
   > >>   
   > >>"That's nice.  Now, be a good girl and let the men continue their   
   > >>talk.  Run along and help in the kitchen." :-)   
   > >   
   > >   
   > > I'm sure that's what he'd like to be able to do, but actually I think   
   he's   
   > > afraid of women.   
   > >   
   > >>Please note that I would never think or state this, and if I every   
   > >>tried, the line would form around the block to knock some sense into   
   > >>me.  This line would be headed by my mother, her mother, my sister, my   
   > >>sister-in-law, and a lot of female friends.  And I don't doubt that   
   > >>there would be a good number of men I know in that line.   
   > >>   
   > >>I know many strong willed and intelligent women, and a good number of   
   > >>them are close relatives, like my mother and my sister.  On an issue   
   > >>that directly affects women, there is no way that I would not lsiten   
   > >>to what they have to say.  And they are probably one of the main   
   > >>reasons that I am pro-choice, because I know for a fact that they can   
   > >>decide for themselves what is best for them, and they do not need me   
   > >>horning in on that decision.   
   > >   
   > >   
   > > Of course they don't, but with the attitude you've got, you're probably   
   one   
   > > of the first people whose opinion they'd seek.  Can you imagine any   
   woman   
   > > seeking Robert's opinion on life-changing decisions?   
   >   
   > BWAHAHAHAHHHAAA!!  SNERK!   
      
   Snerk!  Oh, I love that.  I realised that it was the sound I made when I   
   read your post - I'd never thought of spelling it before.  :)   
      
   Sorry, I almost hurt myself there.  That was   
   > a good joke, though.  And I think you're correct.  We frighten him for   
   > some reason.   
   >   
   > BK   
   > AA#1992   
      
      
   --   
   June G   
   # 364   
   http://uk.geocities.com/junegill@btopenworld.com/webpages/index.html.html   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)