XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion, us.issues.abortion   
   From: askme@netins.net   
      
   "Robert B. Winn"  wrote in message   
   news:7943568.0403030752.734a2d9b@posting.google.com...   
   > "MrD Pstychologist \(retired\)"  wrote in message   
   news:...   
   > > "Robert B. Winn"  wrote in message   
   > > news:7943568.0403011937.6ea3988e@posting.google.com...   
   > > > "MrD Pstychologist \(retired\)"  wrote in message   
   > >  news:...   
   > > > > "Robert B. Winn"  wrote in message   
   > > > > news:7943568.0402291255.bab363c@posting.google.com...   
   > > > > > "MrD Pstychologist \(retired\)"  wrote in   
   message   
   > >  news:...   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > >  oppressiveness,   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > then yes, I will continue to do so forever.   
   After   
   > >  all,   
   > >  there is no   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > reason to believe that someone that has been   
   dead   
   > >  for   
   > > > >  2000   
   > > > >  years   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > will   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > return, except as an exhibit in a museum.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I do not think anyone will be able to   
   influence   
   > >  you   
   > > > >  other   
   > > > >  than   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Satan   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry, but a fictional character out of your   
   > >  mythology   
   > > > >  has   
   > > > >  no   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > influence on me.  You have never even attempted   
   to   
   > > > >  present   
   > > > >  objective   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > evidence that your mythology is based on fact.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > until Jesus Christ destroys the wicked by   
   fire.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Be sure to wear your asbestos long johns.  You   
   will   
   > >  be   
   > >  needing them   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > more than I will.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  That will probably get your attention.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And yours, since according to your beliefs, you   
   will   
   > >  be   
   > >  burning at   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tims.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Robert b. Winn   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, all you have succeeded in doing is showing   
   > >  that   
   > > > >  you   
   > > > >  can lie,   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > call people names, insult them, and run away and   
   > >  hide   
   > > > >  behind   
   > > > >  the   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > apron   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > strings of your personal beliefs.  Normal for   
   you, I   
   > > > >  will   
   > > > >  admit.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are the only one that is showing any signs of   
   being   
   > > > >  feeble   
   > > > >  minded,   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't think you are pretending.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mark Sebree   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have never claimed to be unable to tell what a   
   child   
   > >  is.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > No.  You have claimed that I was unable to tell waht   
   a   
   > >  child   
   > >  was.  A   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > lie.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >  I have never killed any children.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > Nobody claimed that you had.  But you have claimed   
   that   
   > >  I   
   > > > >  have   
   > > > >  killed   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > children, that I advocate killing children, and   
   support   
   > >  killing   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > children.  All three are lies.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >   As I understand what you are saying,   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > Given your history, it is doubtful that you   
   understand   
   > >  anything.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > you   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > accuse people who are not involved in these things   
   of   
   > > > >  being   
   > > > >  feeble   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > minded.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > No, I accuse people that cannot tell reality from   
   > >  fantasy,   
   > > > >  and   
   > > > >  that   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > insists on lying after being shown and told the   
   truth to   
   > >  be   
   > >  feeble   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > minded.  And that was only after you started calling   
   me   
   > > > >  that.   
   > > > >  What's   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > more, you actually fit the definition (posted   
   above),   
   > >  since   
   > > > >  you   
   > > > >  are   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > showing a deficiency in intelligence, as well as a   
   lack   
   > >  of   
   > >  intelligent   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > forethought or consideration.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > So, your own posts provide evidence that you may   
   well be   
   > >  feeble   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > minded.  They certainly provide enough evidence of   
   your   
   > >  lies.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >    I did not say that you were feeble minded.  I   
   said   
   > >  that   
   > > > >  you   
   > > > >  were   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > pretending to be feeble minded.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > Robert b. winn   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > Either way, it is still a lie.  Either statement can   
   be   
   > > > >  proven   
   > > > >  false   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > by simply reading my posts.  They show an abundance   
   of   
   > >  intelligence,   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > an strong will, intelligent consideration and   
   > >  forethought,   
   > >  and a   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > resolute disposition.  The exact opposite of "feeble   
   > >  mindedness".   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > So, my previous statement is proven again.  All you   
   can   
   > >  do   
   > > > >  is   
   > > > >  lie,   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > call people names, and run away.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > Mark Sebree   
   > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > So what was your forethought about this secular   
   dictionary   
   > >  definition?   
   > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > child  n.  1.  an unborn or recently born person.   
   > > > > > > > > > > >                               Merriam-Webster   
   dictionary   
   > >  1970   
   > > > > > > > > > > > Robert B. winn   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > That it is not universally accepted, since it does not   
   > >  appear in   
   > >  most   
   > > > > > > > > > > dictionaries of the English Language, and does not   
   appear as   
   > >  the   
   > >  first   
   > > > > > > > > > > definition (for some reason, you seem to place some   
   > >  importance   
   > > > >  in   
   > > > >  the   
   > > > > > > > > > > position) in any other dictionary I have seen.   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)