XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism
XPost: alt.religion.christian, alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion
XPost: us.issues.abortion
From: askme@netins.net
"Robert B. Winn" wrote in message
news:7943568.0403030801.3841276c@posting.google.com...
> "MrD Pstychologist \(retired\)" wrote in message
news:...
> > "Robert B. Winn" wrote in message
> > news:7943568.0403021859.422a4758@posting.google.com...
> > > "MrD Pstychologist \(retired\)" wrote in message
> > news:...
> > > > "Robert B. Winn" wrote in message
> > > > news:7943568.0403021243.60a116@posting.google.com...
> > > > > "MrD Pstychologist \(retired\)" wrote in
message
> > news:...
> > > > > > "Robert B. Winn" wrote in message
> > > > > > news:7943568.0402291642.55253256@posting.google.com...
> > > > > > > sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in message
> > news:...
> > > > > > > > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in message
> > news:<7943568.0402281911.1b16fc18@posting.google.com>...
> > > > > > > > > sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in message
> > news:...
> > > > > > > > > > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in
message
> > news:<7943568.0402270916.8ef63b3@posting.google.com>...
> > > > > > > > > > > sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in message
> > news:...
> > > > > > > > > > > > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in
> > message
> > news:<7943568.0402240700.945360c@posting.google.com>...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in
message
> > news:...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [snip for brevity]
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > And it would seem that your argument is with every
other
> > dictionary of
> > > > > > > > > > > > the English language. And the only reason that you
> > think
> > > > that
> > > > Merriam
> > > > > > > > > > > > Webster is a "very good dictionary" is that it lists
> > your
> > opinion
> > > > > > > > > > > > about the definition of a "child" first. What you
> > cannot
> > > > handle
> > > > is
> > > > > > > > > > > > the fact that most dictionaries don't even list your
> > preferred
> > > > > > > > > > > > definition, showing that your defintion is not even
> > universally
> > > > > > > > > > > > accepted in the English language, and yet mine is.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Mark Sebree
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I did not have a definiton for the word child.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Yes, you do. I have seen you post it many times.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > The English language did.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > And it still does. And that definition is "a person
between
> > > > birth
> > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > puberty". That definition has been in use for
centuries,
> > and is
> > the
> > > > > > > > > > one that is found in every dictionary that I have seen.
> > This
> > > > > > > > > > indicates near universal accepance of that definition.
Too
> > bad
> > you
> > > > > > > > > > cannot accept that fact.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Sorry that you do not like the English language.
> > > > > > > > > > > Robert B. Winn
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I like the English language just fine. By all
indications,
> > I
> > > > know
> > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > better than you do. Especially given that I also know
the
> > meanings
> > > > > > > > > > and usages of idioms and euphanisms, something that you
> > don't
> > > > seem
> > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > comprehend.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Mark Sebree
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > So what do you say this is, an idiom or a euphemism?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > child n. 1. an unborn or recently born person
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Robert b. winn
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > A limited, recent, and somewhat inaccurate definition that
has
> > been
> > > > > > > > developed by anti-choice activists for propaganda reasons,
and
> > to
> > help
> > > > > > > > them cloud the issue of abortion. If they wanted to be
accurate
> > > > > > > > (which would hurt their position), they would be using the
> > proper
> > > > > > > > words, which as embryo and fetus, depending on the stage of
the
> > > > > > > > pregnancy. No doubt it was included in the dictionary for
> > > > > > > > completeness sake, since the job of a dictionary,
particularly
> > large
> > > > > > > > and unabridged dictionaries, is to provide an unbiased list
of
> > > > > > > > definitions of words that are in use at the time of the
> > printing,
> > and
> > > > > > > > not pass judgement on the accuracy of those definitions that
> > have
> > come
> > > > > > > > into use in recent years.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The second half of the definition, "a...recently born
person",
> > is
> > > > > > > > accuarate, by the way.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Mark Sebree
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > So is the first part of the definition. It has been in use
for as
> > > > > > > long as there have been children.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Deceiver!! There have been children much, much longer than the
> > english
> > > > > > language has existed. Jesus wept!!
> > > > > > I'm not sure I've ever seen a more powerful force for Satan than
you
> > have
> > > > > > crafted yourself into, deceiver. The Spirit denies you.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > MrD
> > > > >
> > > > > And you think that definitions of words give you the right to kill
> > > > chidren.
> > > >
> > > > Your god kills children.
> > > > MrD
> > >
> > > Jesus Christ never killed one person. However, the wicked will be
> > > destoyed by fire when Christ returns the second time. Understand,
> > > though, that it is their choice for that to happen. All they would
> > > have to do to prevent it would be to repent of their sins.
> > Jesus Christ kills people.
> > MrD
>
> If you believe that, then you should take your accusation to Jesus Christ.
I thought Jesus was in all of you believers? I hold you personally
responsible. .
MrD
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
