XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion, us.issues.abortion   
   From: fnord2k@yahoo.com   
      
   In article <7943568.0403041644.36d5fdf2@posting.google.com>, Robert B.   
   Winn  wrote:   
      
   > William Klee  wrote in message   
   > news:<030320042358371434%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...   
   > > In article <7943568.0403031947.184e7509@posting.google.com>, Robert B.   
   > > Winn  wrote:   
   > >   
   > > > William Klee  wrote in message   
   > > > news:<010320042153447881%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...   
   > > > > In article , Mark   
   > > > > Sebree  wrote:   
   > > > >   
   > > > > > William Klee  wrote in message   
   > > > > > news:<290220042233071395%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...   
   > > > > > > In article , Mark   
   > > > > > > Sebree  wrote:   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > "B. Kildow"  wrote in message   
   > > > > > > > news:<40421F94.3080204@spamenot.foxinternet.net>...   
   > > > > > > > > William Klee wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > In article <7943568.0402230645.742c8dde@posting.google.com>,   
   > > > > > > > > > Robert B.   
   > > > > > > > > > Winn  wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > >>William Klee  wrote in message   
   > > > > > > > > >>news:<220220041521307944%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...   
   > > > > > > > > >>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>In article <7943568.0402221232.260aca84@posting.google.com>,   
   > >  Robert   
   > > > > > > > > >>>B.   
   > > > > > > > > >>>Winn  wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > >>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>William Klee  wrote in message   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>news:<220220040011157640%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>In article   
   > <7943568.0402211919.45fb9939@posting.google.com>,   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>Robert B.   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>Winn  wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>William Klee  wrote in message   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>news:<210220041442212958%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>In article   
   > <7943568.0402210619.28784b1@posting.google.com>,   
   > >  Robert   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>B.   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>Winn  wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>William Klee  wrote in message   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>news:<200220042222553213%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>In article   
   > >  <7943568.0402201702.1d62a2d7@posting.google.com>,   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>Robert   
   > > > > > > > > >>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>B.   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>Winn  wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>William Klee  wrote in message   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>news:<200220040023246492%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>In article <7943568.0402191802.41d7ab57@   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>What do you think of this scripture?   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Luke 2:5  To be taxed with Mary his espoused   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>wife,   
   > > > > > > > > >>   
   > > > > > > > > >>> being   
   > > > > > > > > >>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> great   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> with   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>child.   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>A: I think it says Mary was pregnant.   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>B: It's not germane to life in the real world.   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>C: It's a non-sequitor.   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>We speak English here in the United States.  If   
   > you   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>do not   
   > > > > > > > > >>   
   > > > > > > > > >>> want to   
   > > > > > > > > >>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>discuss something with me, why don't you just say   
   > so   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>> instead   
   > > > > > > > > >>> of   
   > > > > > > > > >>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>throwing out words from a dead European language?   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>Oops, I'm sorry, I didn't realize that you're not   
   > smart   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>> enough   
   > > > > > > > > >>> to   
   > > > > > > > > >>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>use a   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>dictionary. It's the word "non-sequitor" that's   
   > >  throwing   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>> you. It   
   > > > > > > > > >>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>means   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>"does not follow", as in any comment of yours does   
   > not   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>> follow   
   > > > > > > > > >>> the   
   > > > > > > > > >>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>logic   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>of the post you're allegedly responding to.   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>Incedentally,   
   > > > > > > > > >>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>non-sequitor   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>is not a word from a dead European langauge, it's   
   > an   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>English   
   > > > > > > > > >>   
   > > > > > > > > >>> word   
   > > > > > > > > >>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>that   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>*comes* from an almost-dead European language.   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>If you want to say does not follow, go ahead and   
   say   
   > >  it.   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>Exactly what I've *been* doing. And the word I use   
   > to say   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>it is   
   > > > > > > > > >>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>"non-sequitor".   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>Using Latin   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>words only shows that you believe that Europeans   
   > are the   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>> source   
   > > > > > > > > >>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>of all   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>knowledge.   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>No, it means there's a perfectly good word that says   
   > >  exactly   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>> what I   
   > > > > > > > > >>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>want to say. And that word is "non-sequitor".   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>Europeans are really the worst people on earth to   
   > >  imitate.   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>Didn't know you were a European.   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>I knew you were.   
   > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)