XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism
XPost: alt.religion.christian, alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion
XPost: us.issues.abortion
From: askme@netins.net
"Robert B. Winn" wrote in message
news:7943568.0403051715.506e2bf8@posting.google.com...
> William Klee wrote in message
news:<050320041138484364%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...
> > In article <7943568.0403050649.150fe3ef@posting.google.com>, Robert B.
> > Winn wrote:
> >
> > > William Klee wrote in message
> > > news:<040320042337237496%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...
> > > > In article <7943568.0403040309.1e966251@posting.google.com>, Robert
B.
> > > > Winn wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > William Klee wrote in message
> > > > > news:<030320041326199620%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...
> > > > > > In article <7943568.0403030818.7ecfab5c@posting.google.com>,
Robert B.
> > > > > > Winn wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > William Klee wrote in message
> > > > > > > news:<290220042217486287%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...
> > > > > > > > In article <7943568.0402291643.6f65bca4@posting.google.com>,
Robert
> > > > > > > > B.
> > > > > > > > Winn wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > William Klee wrote in message
> > > > > > > > > news:<290220041328190671%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...
> > > > > > > > > > In article
<7943568.0402290229.3bd0558@posting.google.com>,
> > Robert
> > > > > > > > > > B.
> > > > > > > > > > Winn wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > William Klee wrote in message
> > > > > > > > > > > news:<270220042359048631%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...
> > > > > > > > > > > > In article
<7943568.0402271938.35d935cf@posting.google.com>,
> > Robert
> > > > > > > > > > > > B.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Winn wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > telige@mail.clara.fl.com (William) wrote in
message
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
news:<403fd63b.13833633@news-text.blueyonder.co.uk>...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 27 Feb 2004 04:38:18 -0800,
rbwinn47@mybluelight.com
> > > > (Robert
> > > > B.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Winn) wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Ex 3:14 And God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I
AM: and
> > he
> > > > said,
> > > > Thou
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >shalt say unto the children of Israel, I AM
hath sent
> > me
> > > > unto
> > > > you.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >15 And God said moreover unto Moses, Thou
shalt say
> > unto
> > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >children
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >of Israel, The Lord God of your fathers,
theeGod of
> > > > Abraham,
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >God
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >of Isaac, the God of Jacob , hath sent me unto
you:
> > this
> > is my
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >name
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >forever, and this is my memorial unto all
generations.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Robert B. Winn
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which, of course, is completely irrelevant.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > William
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Why would you consider it irrelevant?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Because it's a non-sequitor.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > No, it is not.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > A non-sequitor remains a non-sequitor no matter how hard
you
> > stomp
> > > > > > > > > > your
> > > > > > > > > > feet and insist "is too is too is too!" (Where I'm from,
we call
> > > > > > > > > > that a
> > > > > > > > > > tantrum and consider it a sign of childishness.)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I was just trying to get you to use your Latin.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > It's English that comes from Latin.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Now
> > > > > > > > > > > that you have shown that you are proficient in that
language,
> > > > > > > > > > > don't
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > What level of expertise do you consider "proficient"?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > you think you should consider becoming a Catholic
priest?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Nope. I don't believe in pedophilia.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > It is not a
> > > > > > > > > > > difficult job, and you already seem to have all the
> > > > > > > > > > > qualifications.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > A: I'm an atheist, which knocks any kind of priesthood
out of
> > > > > > > > > > consideration.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > B: No matter how much you lie about it, I don't believe
in
> > > > > > > > > > pedophilia,
> > > > > > > > > > so even if I did feel like adopting the parasitic
lifestyle of
> > > > > > > > > > religion, catholicism is right out.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Well, if you are going to imitate a certain kind of
person, it
> > > > > > > > > seems
> > > > > > > > > to me that you should consider being the real thing.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I'll consider that if I ever decide to imitate someone. Why
don't
> > > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > consider imitating someone who doesn't lie and evade with
every
> > > > > > > > breath?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I don't think I want to imitate anyone.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So you *like* being a liar. Oh, well, nothing new about *that*.
> > > > >
> > > > > Here we are at this individual's one remaining response. Now all
that
> > > > > we need to determine is how many times the response will be
repeated.
> > > >
> > > > That's easy: how many times will you lie?
> > >
> > > OK, that would be two times you have repeated this response here.
> > > Let's go for a world record.
> >
> > Keep lying, I'll keep pointing it out. If you want me to stop calling
> > you a liar, just stop lying. Easy, isn't it?
>
> three
You've already said three.
You don't make a very good nutter, I can see you pulling at your strings.
MrD
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
