XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion, us.issues.abortion   
   From: askme@netins.net   
      
   "Robert B. Winn" wrote in message   
   news:7943568.0403061133.7fd5aa71@posting.google.com...   
   > sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in message   
   news:...   
   > > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in message   
   news:<7943568.0403050654.29735c85@posting.google.com>...   
   > > > sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in message   
   news:...   
   > > > > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in message   
   news:<7943568.0403040316.6ba82565@posting.google.com>...   
   > > > > > sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in message   
   news:...   
   > > > > > > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in message   
   news:<7943568.0402290220.c7c972d@posting.google.com>...   
   > > > > > > > sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in message   
   news:...   
   > > > > > > > > rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in message   
   news:<7943568.0402240447.655816a5@posting.google.com>...   
   > > > > > > > > > sebree@infionline.net (Mark Sebree) wrote in message   
   news:...   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > [snip for brevity]   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > That is because it happens to list your personal opinion   
   about what a   
   > > > > > > > > child is first. That is probably the only reason that you   
   like it.   
   > > > > > > > > If it didn't, you would search for another dictionary that   
   did, and   
   > > > > > > > > say that one is "much better than the ones [I] use."   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > However, by showing the defintions from numerous other   
   dictionaries,   
   > > > > > > > > and pointing out that most of these dictionaries do not even   
   list your   
   > > > > > > > > definition, much less as the first one, I have shown that   
   the   
   > > > > > > > > definition that you personally prefer is not universally   
   accepted   
   > > > > > > > > within the English language. However, the definition that I   
   use is   
   > > > > > > > > listed in every English language dictionary I checked,   
   including   
   > > > > > > > > Merriam-Webster, showing that it is a pretty much   
   universally accepted   
   > > > > > > > > definition.   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > Mark Sebree   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > Well, abortion is a pretty much universally accepted form of   
   homicide.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > Incorrect. Abortion is not a form of homicide at all, nor has   
   it ever   
   > > > > > > been considered as such. It is a medical procedure that is   
   greatly   
   > > > > > > beneficial to the women that desire it.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > Saying that something is popular with the people of today is   
   not the   
   > > > > > > > way to convince me it is good.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > You should know. You keep saying that imposing hardship and   
   misery on   
   > > > > > > women is good, and most people are not buying it.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > Adultery is the universally accepted lifestyle.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > Since when? And you are the only one that seems to see any   
   adultery   
   > > > > > > going on, yet you cannot show that anyone here is committing   
   adultery.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > So when you have convinced God to accept adultery, come   
   > > > > > > > back and talk to me about abortion.   
   > > > > > > > Robert B. Winn   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > Fine. Give me some verifiable way to contact your deity and   
   converse   
   > > > > > > with him. Mailing address, email, phone number, whatever.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > And for some reason, you think that your deity will agree with   
   your   
   > > > > > > position. Why is that? Because that deity only exists in your   
   head?   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > And you have yet to even try to show that I have committed   
   adultery,   
   > > > > > > or any other criminal act that you have accused me of. All you   
   have   
   > > > > > > done is run away. The fact of the matter is, you refuse to   
   debate,   
   > > > > > > because you don't know how to. All you can do is dictate, call   
   people   
   > > > > > > names, and run away. And you cannot accept that most people do   
   not   
   > > > > > > accept your lame opinions without something solid to support   
   them, and   
   > > > > > > your religious opinions and beliefs are not considered solid,   
   since   
   > > > > > > they have no relevance to anyone else. This is clearly evidence   
   in   
   > > > > > > the vast majority of your posts, particularly in the ones that   
   > > > > > > question you and ask you to support your opinions with objective   
   > > > > > > evidence.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > Mark Sebree   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > Well, keep repeating your mantra, and it will become automatic   
   after a   
   > > > > > while, whether you believe it or not.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Yes, we have noticed you doing this. That is why we keep calling   
   you   
   > > > > on your evasions.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > > Adulterers are people who find   
   > > > > > it very difficult to change anything they do.   
   > > > > > Robert B. Winn   
   > > > >   
   > > > > So, now you are admitting that you are an adulterer? If you say so.   
   > > > > So, who is your mistress, and does your wife know about her? After   
   > > > > all, stating that you are an adulterer is admitting that you are   
   > > > > cheating on your wife.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > You have shown great difficulty in refraining from lying, failing to   
   > > > > address the points in the post that you are responding to, failing   
   to   
   > > > > backing up your accusations and allegations, or changing any of your   
   > > > > other poor habits in posting. It is obvious that you are not   
   talking   
   > > > > about me with the last statement, since I am not an adulterer.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Mark Sebree   
   > > >   
   > > > Well, you seem to disagree with Jesus Christ about what an adulterer   
   > > > is.   
   > >   
   > > Of course. I prefer to believe in facts rather than a fictional   
   > > character from your mythology. After all, the definition I am using   
   > > is the same used everywhere except in your head.   
   > >   
   > > > I have to believe Jesus Crrist rather than you.   
   > > > Robert B. Winn   
   > >   
   > > If you want to believe in a make-believe character from your   
   > > mythology, be my guest. The rest of the world will believe the truth,   
   > > and leave you to your delusions.   
   > >   
   > > Sorry, but nobody is required to accept your redefinition of the word   
   > > "adultery", especially when we have a perfectly good meaning with a   
   > > very long history already available.   
   > >   
   > > Mark Sebree   
   >   
   > Well, the definition given by Jesus Christ pre-dates your legal   
   > definition by a significant amount of time.   
      
   We'll take a break from our regular programming to bring you this latest   
   news...   
      
   Jesus didn't define adultery, he was using it as a metaphor for unbelievers.   
   Let's look at the word he used:   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|