XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism
XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion, us.issues.abortion
From: ladyhawk_twonospam@hotmail.com
Robert B. Winn wrote:
> --sexkitten-- wrote in message
news:...
>
>>Robert B. Winn wrote:
>>
>>
>>>--sexkitten-- wrote in message
news:...
>>>
>>>
>>>>--sexkitten-- wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>"junegill" wrote in message
>>>>>>news:...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Robert B. Winn" wrote in message
>>>>>>>news:7943568.0403290933.3ff2f30c@posting.google.com...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"junegill" wrote in message
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>news:...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>[piggybacking]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>"--sexkitten--" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>news:c453om$2e0gf5$2@ID-163025.news.uni-berlin.de...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>[snip]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Well, what about the opinion of Merriam-Webster dictionary?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>child n. 1. an unborn or recently born person
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Robert b. Winn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Thus making your average infant an adult.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Only to pro-abortion people. Normal people can tell what a child
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>is.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Yes, they can. A person between birth and puberty, like the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>dictionaries
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>say.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>child n. 1. an unborn or recently born person
>>>>>>>>>>> Merriam-Webster dictionary.
>>>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>What's the Merriam-Webster dictionary definition of 'adulterer'?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I don't know. Probably something Mark Seebree would like. The only
>>>>>>>>definition of adulterer I use is the one Jesus Christ gave.
>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>So Merriam-Webster definitions are OK when they say what you want
>>>>>>>them to
>>>>>>>say, but to be ignored when they don't, right? Did Jesus ever define
>>>>>>>'child' as being unborn?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Lots of times. Read the first verses of Jeremiah chapter 1.
>>>>>>Robert B. Winn
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Jesus did not write Jeremiah. The only direct quotes attributed to Jesus
>>>>>were in the first 4 books of the OT (and one I think in Acts). Besides,
>>>>>you claimed the OT was no longer valid, so it's definitions no longer
>>>>>apply. Please provide a quote from the first 4 books of the NT.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Being that I'm speaking to you, I'd better make that clearer. Please
>>>>provide a quote from the first 4 books of the NT *specifically
>>>>attributed to Jesus*, in other words, something that he said defining
child.
>>>
>>>
>>>Why? If you do not accept Old Testament prophets, you are not going
>>>to accept anything said by Jesus Christ.
>>
>>I don't accept either, I just want you to prove your point for a change.
>>
>> At any rate, Jesus Christ
>>
>>>said that he was Jehovah, the God of the Old Testament, who was being
>>>quoted by Jeremiah in the first verses of his book.
>>> I am not a research facility for atheists. Read the Bible
>>>yourselves.
>>
>>You aren't even a research facility for christians. Every time you say
>>this it means you have nothing to provide.
>>
>>
>>>Robert B. Winn
>
>
> I am not a research facility of any kind.
> Robert B. Winn
That much is obvious, since you don't even know your own religious text.
--
--sexkitten--If it wasn't meant to be eaten, it wouldn't be shaped like
a taco.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
