home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.flame.abortion      Abortion sucks... literally      4,310 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 2,998 of 4,310   
   B. Kildow to Light Templar   
   Re: immoral people (1/2)   
   01 Apr 04 15:14:06   
   
   XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion, us.issues.abortion   
   From: tracker99@spamenot.foxinternet.net   
      
   Light Templar wrote:   
   > Robert B. Winn wrote:   
   >   
   >>"Light Templar"  wrote in message   
   >>news:...   
   >>   
   >>>Robert B. Winn wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>"Light Templar"  wrote in message   
   >>>>news:...   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>"Light Templar"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>news:<4Qjac.7816$Dv2.7376@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>"Light Templar"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>>news:...   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>"Light Templar"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>>>>news:...   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>William Klee  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>news:<280320041826457289%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>In article   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>><7943568.0403281520.7e373d7a@posting.google.com>, Robert   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>B. Winn  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>"MrD Pstychologist \(retired\)"  wrote   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>in message news:...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>"Robert B. Winn"  wrote in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>message   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>news:7943568.0403280544.e9aa127@posting.google.com...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You really live in la-la land, don't you.  Most people   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>arrested are taken before a pro-abortion police state   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>judge and told that they do not have the right to trial   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>by jury.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Wow, that really is some projection you have going.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Most people meaning you?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I can't help that you are so out of touch with reality   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>that you cannot be brought to trial in front of a jury   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>based on your incompetence to stand trial.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>My local papers are repeatedly reporting different   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>results from jury trials of normal citizens.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>There is no 'pro-abortion police state' in evidence.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You are a delusional idiot with a personal ax to grind.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>This is probably due to you being institutionalized from   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>time to time to protect yourself and society from the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>possible repercussions of your projective delusions.  I   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>think it is time you see a doctor.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>MrD   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>I do not care what you say.   The majority of court cases   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>in the United States today take place before judges who   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>tell the defendants that they do not have the right to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>trial by jury.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>Sorry to tell you this, boobie, but there isn't a magical   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>number that, once reached, makes your lie true. It just   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>makes it a repeated lie.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>Well, since you have accused me of lying, it would be up to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>you to prove it.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>The majority of criminal cases today take place before   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>pro-abortion judges who tell the defendants that they do not   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>have the right to trial by jury.  Are you trying to say you   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>have never had a traffic violation?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>Can you cite some of these cases?   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>I can cite all of the traffic violations taking place at the   
   >>>>>>>>>>present time in your city.  No one is allowed trial by jury   
   >>>>>>>>>>for a traffic violation any more.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>Where do you live?   If I want a trial by jury, all I need do   
   >>>>>>>>>is ask.    The Judge cannot, per State law, deny it.  It's   
   >>>>>>>>>generally rather pointless for a misdemeanor though.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>In most states, only serious felonies are given trial by jury.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>Probably because if you pulled people out of work to serve on   
   >>>>>>>>>juries for every little infraction, the country would shut   
   >>>>>>>>>down.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>This   
   >>>>>>>>>>began with a minority opinion written by Justice Thurgood   
   >>>>>>>>>>Marshall in which he stated that the Constitution did not   
   >>>>>>>>>>really guarantee trial by jury in all criminal prosecutions   
   >>>>>>>>>>even though it said it did. Within a few years, states were   
   >>>>>>>>>>denying trial by jury, which was then upheld by state supreme   
   >>>>>>>>>>courts.   This arrangement proved to be so profitable for   
   >>>>>>>>>>lawyers that they have done whatever they can do to protect   
   >>>>>>>>>>this denial of rights of United States citizens. Robert B.   
   >>>>>>>>>>Winn   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>Where was it ruled that it is a denial of rights?   Last time I   
   >>>>>>>>>fought a traffic ticket, I didn't need a lawyer, and I won...   
   >>>>>>>>>So how was that profitable for the lawyers?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>They did not have to provide a jury.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>Lawyers do not provide juries, juries do not cost lawyers a dime.   
   >>>>>>>How is it profitable for the lawyers?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>It is much cheaper for them to   
   >>>>>>>>give some exemplary examples of pro-abortion values, such as you   
   >>>>>>>>are,   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>What does abortion, pro or con, have to do with juryless trials?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>an acquital to show everyone how fair they are, than to provide   
   >>>>>>>>juries to those who ask for them.  I was the person who decided   
   >>>>>>>>that denial of the right to trial by jury to United States   
   >>>>>>>>citizens was a denial of rights.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>Yet, you haven't answered the question as to exactly how it is a   
   >>>>>>>denial of rights if you can still have a jury trial is you so   
   >>>>>>>chose?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> You pro-abortion people were all in favor of it.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>I can get a jury trial when I want/need or have to have one, and   
   >>>>>>>can forego a jury trial for misdemeanors when I want/need to.   
   >>>>>>>It seems that I have more rights, rather than fewer.   How,   
   >>>>>>>exactly, and please be specific, would you handle gathering   
   >>>>>>>together 12 people for each and every trial, no matter how small   
   >>>>>>>the infraction, and keep the needed manpower in our employment   
   >>>>>>>base?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>Well, there is no greater need than some work being done to stop   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca