XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion, us.issues.abortion   
   From: fnordy2k@yahoo.com   
      
   In article <7943568.0404011811.54652c8d@posting.google.com>, Robert B.   
   Winn wrote:   
      
   > William Klee wrote in message   
   > news:<010420040214457311%fnordy2k@yahoo.com>...   
   > > In article <7943568.0403312024.e302dac@posting.google.com>, Robert B.   
   > > Winn wrote:   
   > >   
   > > > --sexkitten-- wrote in message   
   > > > news:...   
   > > > > Robert B. Winn wrote:   
   > > > > > --sexkitten-- wrote in message   
   > > > > > news:...   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > >>Robert B. Winn wrote:   
   > > > > >>   
   > > > > >>>--sexkitten-- wrote in message   
   > > > > >>>news:...   
   > > > > >>>   
   > > > > >>>   
   > > > > >>>>--sexkitten-- wrote:   
   > > > > >>>>   
   > > > > >>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:   
   > > > > >>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>"junegill" wrote in message   
   > > > > >>>>>>news:...   
   > > > > >>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>>"Robert B. Winn" wrote in message   
   > > > > >>>>>>>news:7943568.0403290933.3ff2f30c@posting.google.com...   
   > > > > >>>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>>>"junegill" wrote in message   
   > > > > >>>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>>news:...   
   > > > > >>>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>>>>[piggybacking]   
   > > > > >>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>>>>"--sexkitten--" wrote in   
   > message   
   > > > > >>>>>>>>>news:c453om$2e0gf5$2@ID-163025.news.uni-berlin.de...   
   > > > > >>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn wrote:   
   > > > > >>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>>>>[snip]   
   > > > > >>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Well, what about the opinion of Merriam-Webster   
   > dictionary?   
   > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>child n. 1. an unborn or recently born person   
   > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Robert b. Winn   
   > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Thus making your average infant an adult.   
   > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>Only to pro-abortion people. Normal people can tell what   
   a   
   > > child   
   > > > > >>>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>>is.   
   > > > > >>>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn   
   > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>Yes, they can. A person between birth and puberty, like the   
   > > > > >>>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>>dictionaries   
   > > > > >>>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>say.   
   > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>child n. 1. an unborn or recently born person   
   > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Merriam-Webster dictionary.   
   > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn   
   > > > > >>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>>>>What's the Merriam-Webster dictionary definition of   
   > 'adulterer'?   
   > > > > >>>>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>>>I don't know. Probably something Mark Seebree would like. The   
   > only   
   > > > > >>>>>>>>definition of adulterer I use is the one Jesus Christ gave.   
   > > > > >>>>>>>>Robert B. Winn   
   > > > > >>>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>>So Merriam-Webster definitions are OK when they say what you   
   > want   
   > > > > >>>>>>>them to   
   > > > > >>>>>>>say, but to be ignored when they don't, right? Did Jesus ever   
   > define   
   > > > > >>>>>>>'child' as being unborn?   
   > > > > >>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>>Lots of times. Read the first verses of Jeremiah chapter 1.   
   > > > > >>>>>>Robert B. Winn   
   > > > > >>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>>Jesus did not write Jeremiah. The only direct quotes attributed to   
   > > > > >>>>>Jesus   
   > > > > >>>>>were in the first 4 books of the OT (and one I think in Acts).   
   > > > > >>>>>Besides,   
   > > > > >>>>>you claimed the OT was no longer valid, so it's definitions no   
   > > > > >>>>>longer   
   > > > > >>>>>apply. Please provide a quote from the first 4 books of the NT.   
   > > > > >>>>>   
   > > > > >>>>   
   > > > > >>>>Being that I'm speaking to you, I'd better make that clearer.   
   > > > > >>>>Please   
   > > > > >>>>provide a quote from the first 4 books of the NT *specifically   
   > > > > >>>>attributed to Jesus*, in other words, something that he said   
   > > > > >>>>defining   
   > > > > >>>>child.   
   > > > > >>>   
   > > > > >>>   
   > > > > >>>Matthew 18:14 Even so it is not the will of your Father which is in   
   > > > > >>>Heaven, that one of these little ones should perish.   
   > > > > >>>Robert B. Winn   
   > > > > >>   
   > > > > >>I don't see the word abortion in there, and anyhow how is it possible   
   > > > > >>to   
   > > > > >>go against the will of god? Isn't he all knowing and all powerful?   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > Well, if you think satan is doing the will of God, then you are   
   > > > > > probably going to follow satan.   
   > > > > > Robert B. winn   
   > > > >   
   > > > > ...how is it possible to go against the will of god? Isn't he all   
   > > > > knowing and all powerful?   
   > > >   
   > > > Well, for instance, God said, Thou shalt not kill.   
   > >   
   > > And according to the bible, he also said, "Kill them all, every man,   
   > > woman, child and infant," as well as "special blessings upon the man   
   > > who kills an infant by bashing its brains out against a hand wall or   
   > > rock." So much for "thou shalt not kill." And while we're on the topic   
   > > of "thou shalt", wasn't there one that went "Thou shalt not lie"? When   
   > > did you plan to honor *that* one, liar?   
   > >   
   > > > But today the   
   > > > majority of people see nothing wrong with killing an unborn child.   
   > >   
   > > N++; Another Robert B. Winn Lie (tm), unless you're thinking of all of   
   > > those christians that are killing their kids because god told them to.   
   > >   
   > > > God knows the children were killed.   
   > >   
   > > And rejoices in it.   
   >   
   > Well, I think God would be the best one to judge who is lying.   
      
   And just why do you think god is going to let you off the hook for   
   lying?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|