XPost: alt.abortion, alt.abortion.inequity, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.support.abortion, talk.abortion, us.issues.abortion   
   From: junegill@btinternet.com   
      
   "MrD Pstychologist (retired)"  wrote in message   
   news:c4igak$fea$1@news.netins.net...   
   >   
   > "junegill"  wrote in message   
   > news:c4fsc9$4s7$1@hercules.btinternet.com...   
   > > "Robert B. Winn"  wrote in message   
   > > news:7943568.0403310758.74cc7df5@posting.google.com...   
      
   [snip]   
      
   > > > > You most certainly have cast stones: you've accused Mark of   
   adultery,   
   > > > > homicide and terrorism.  I asked whether _you_ are without sin, not   
   > > Jesus   
   > > > > Christ.  Note that He didn't cast the first, or any, stone at the   
   > woman.   
   > > If   
   > > > > you think that you have the same authority as Jesus to say what He   
   > said,   
   > > > > then you have delusions of grandeur.  Mark is quite right that you   
   are   
   > > > > hateful and oppressive to women: you seem to think you have the   
   right   
   > to   
   > > > > dictate to women what they should do with their own bodies and would   
   > > take   
   > > > > their bodily autonomy away from them - doesn't get much more hateful   
   > and   
   > > > > oppressive than that.   
   > > >   
   > > > Mark Seebree was the one who wrote a long dissertation about his   
   > > > adulteries.  All that took place up until that time was that I pointed   
   > > > out that prophecy says that anyone who denies the existence of God and   
   > > > demands to see a sign is an adulterer, which Mark immediately   
   > > > confirmed to be true in his case.  So I tell him, Go and commit   
   > > > adultery no more, and you claim I have been hateful and oppressive.   
   > >   
   > > That's where your delusions of grandeur come in - telling Mark what to   
   do   
   > as   
   > > though you're Jesus Christ.  You are full of pride (the worst sin), if   
   you   
   > > think you have the same authority as your Deity.   
   > >   
   > > > It appears to me that any criticism of adultery is what you consider   
   > > > to be hateful.   
   > > > Robert B. Winn   
   > >   
   > > No, I do not consider criticism of adultery to be hateful - it's not   
   > anyone   
   > > else's business, but not hateful.  Of course, that's real adultery I'm   
   > > talking about, as in cheating on one's spouse.  What is hateful, as I   
   said   
   > > up above, is that you'd take away women's bodily autonomy if you could.   
   >   
   > Only a complete idiot would take the above paragraph and reply as if   
   you've   
   > accused him of being involved in adultery.  I realise that Winn doesn't   
   > understand what adultery is, but sometimes he really shows just how   
   idiotic   
   > he is.   
      
   Not just idiotic - he's insulting our intelligence by thinking his non   
   sequiturs will fool us into thinking he's answered the points made and the   
   questions asked.  Note that he didn't like to tackle the charge of being   
   full of pride.   
      
   I wouldn't worry too much about him until he begins answering the   
   > same posts twice, as if he's forgotten what he's avoided answering already   
   > and makes a point of avoiding it again.   
      
   Maybe he has Irish ancestry and did it to be sure, to be sure.  :)   
      
   > I think that Winn really does want to control women but he can't even   
   > control himself. I think he is probably afraid of women and the only   
   > relationship he has is with his mother.   
      
   I think you're probably right.   
      
   --   
   June G   
   # 364   
   http://uk.geocities.com/junegill@btopenworld.com/webpages/index.html.html   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)